Answer:
It is known as pluralistic ignorance.
Explanation:
Pluralistic ignorance occurs in social situations when an individual does not feel free to express their opinion and makes a wrong inference of what their peers think, so they end up accepting the option they believe the group would choose, even if they disagree.
An example would be: Karla is on the bus, and a person sits next to her, she watches the woman and thinks that looks like a kind person and would like to talk with her for a while, but nobody talks with other people on the bus so avoid talking to her.
The spectator effect is an example of pluralistic ignorance; when an emergency occurs, the larger the group that observed the emergency situation, the less likely someone will help. The individual in the group may think that it would not be right to help, or that he/she should not help because surely another person would help.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Predators of frogs would need to hunt other food sources, leading to decreases in both the predators and the new prey. The prey of frog would run rampant as one of their predators are now gone.
What exactly is democracy? Abraham Lincoln said, "Of the people, by the people, and for the people." The term democracy is derived from the Greek terms "demos" (people) and "kratos" (power); hence, democracy may be thought of as "power of the people": a form of government that is based on the desire of the people.
Answer:(a) Attention
Explanation:
Attention refers to the behaviour and cognitive way of focusing on one object or subject exceptionally whilst blocking everything else out.
Attention makes you keep out everything else either information or sensation and perception which seems not to matter at that moment and put all your focus energy into that one specific information that is vital to you at that moment .
Sarit is attracted to Mona and everything else seems to not matter at this moment because he wants to focus all his energy to her and probably get all her attention also in return.
Answer:
D. Congress can refuse to fund law clerks and other staf for the SCOTUS
Explanation:
The Executive and Legislative branches have checks against the Judiciary for presidential appointment of justices, congress changing the number of justices on the SCOTUS, congress changing the original jurisdiction of the SCOTUS, congress can change the appellate jurisdiction of the SCOTUS, except refusing to fund law clerks and other staff for the SCOTUS
