1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vova2212 [387]
3 years ago
10

In 2005, a loan broker and appraiser working for a subsidiary of Bank of America appraised the Cassies home at a fair market val

ue of $620,000. Based on that appraisal and other representations by lending personnel, the Cassies elected to refinance their home with a $495,000 adjustable rate mortgage. Lending personnel told them their home would appreciate and they would be able to sell or refinance the home at a later date before having to make higher monthly loan payments. In 2010, the Cassies discovered their home was valued at $250,000. The monthly mortgage payments doubled in size. The Cassies stopped making payments on the mortgage, which had a balance due of $625,000. Soon after, the fair market value of the house was $200,000. Then, the bank foreclosed on the house and the Cassies moved in with family. The Cassies sued Bank of America for fraud. What is the result?
A. The Cassies will lose.
B. The Cassies will recover partial value of their foreclosed home.
C. The Cassies will win.
Business
1 answer:
Tomtit [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C. The Cassies will win.

Explanation:

In the given case, the cassies would win as this was appraisal fraud that done by the company employee who is a Bank of america Subsidiary. Here the loan broker and the appraiser increase the fair market value of cassies home i.e. $620,000 but it would be lesser that is $250,000. So this inflate the value in order to make the payment of high rate with related to the mortgage

You might be interested in
Oscar refuses to pay petra $500 in cash on their contract to repair oscar's washing machine, which petra still possesses at her
musickatia [10]
For the answer to the question above, I think the answer is that
<u><em>petra's lien on the machine will terminate if and only </em></u><span><u><em>if Petra would voluntarily surrender possession.</em></u></span>

I hope my answer helped you. Have a nice day!
6 0
3 years ago
What are three things to look at closely on the contract?
kicyunya [14]
The date, 
signature 
rules.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A price ceiling is binding when it is set
Zielflug [23.3K]
B.below the equilibrium price, causing a surplus
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 2020, Susan retired from her active participation in a 50% owned restaurant business, which she owned for 20 years. Susan is
icang [17]

Question Completion with Options:

a. Susan cannot deduct the $80,000 loss from the restaurant because she is not a material participant.

b. Susan can offset the $80,000 loss against the $150,000 of income from the retail store.

c. Susan will not be able to deduct any losses from the restaurant until she has been retired for at least three years.

d. Assuming Susan continues to hold the interest in the restaurant, she will always treat the losses as active.

Answer:

Susan

b. Susan can offset the $80,000 loss against the $150,000 of income from the retail store.

Explanation:

Susan can offset the $80,000 loss from the restaurant business against the income from the retail store because she has been an active and material participant in both businesses.  For the past 20 years, she had participated materially in the restaurant, only just retiring this year.   At least, she has passed the material participant test, number 5.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following most correctly demonstrates the opportunity cost of
Svetllana [295]

The opportunity cost of choosing to live in a rural area instead of an urban area is the accessibility to greater choices which is in terms of entertainment, food, and shopping. Thus, statement B is correct.

<h3>What do you mean by opportunity cost?</h3>

In microeconomic theory, the opportunity cost of a particular activity alternative is the loss of price or advantage that could be incurred through engaging in that activity, relative to engaging in an alternative activity providing a better return in value or advantage.

The opportunity cost of choosing to live in a rural area instead of an urban area is the accessibility to greater choices in terms of entertainment, food, and shopping. Thus, statement B is correct.

Learn more about Opportunity cost here:

brainly.com/question/1549591

#SPJ1

3 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • How do investors make money off debt
    11·1 answer
  • What are the various product line decision, and when do marketing managers make each of these decisions? What is the meaning of
    10·1 answer
  • If the Fed sells​ $2 million of bonds to the First National​ Bank, what happens to reserves and the monetary​ base?
    13·1 answer
  • The demand for salt is inelastic, and the supply of salt is elastic. The demand for caviar is elastic, and the supply of caviar
    13·1 answer
  • At the beginning of the year, Young Company bought three used machines from Vince, Inc. The machines immediately were overhauled
    13·1 answer
  • Industry is the supply side of the market.<br><br> Question 10 options:<br> True<br> False
    10·1 answer
  • How could a line of credit negatively impact a business?
    12·1 answer
  • The risk-free rate of return is 7.5%, the expected rate of return on the market portfolio is 14%, and the stock of Xyrong Corpor
    5·1 answer
  • The owner of Genuine Subs, Inc., hopes to expand the present operation by adding one new outlet. She has studied three locations
    10·1 answer
  • Please solve this question asap…as i have less time
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!