Answer:
$237,121.76
Explanation:
Compounding is the computation of the future value of a present amount while the opposite of compounding which is the determination of a present value of a future amount is discounting. the relationship between present and future value is given as
Fv = Pv (1 + r)^n
where
Fv = future value
Pv = Present value
n = time
r = rate
Fv = 217000(1 + 0.03) ^3
= $237,121.76
The worth of the home purchased 3 year ago now is $237,121.76
Answer:
C. The ability-to-pay principle.
Explanation:
According to my research on different tax methods, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this tax follows the ability-to-pay principle. This principle states that taxes should be levied according to a taxpayer's ability to pay. Since the tax in this situation is being placed on liquor, which is not a necessity, then it can be said that the buyer has the ability to pay the tax.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
The correct answer is: D) unreasonable demands
Explanation:
These are contradictory demands, whether, in themselves, they require the fulfillment of two or more contradictory or inconsistent conditions with each other, whether it is what the person who generates an internal conflict demands, the foreign demand being to go against its own essence, while the other pole is fidelity to it.
In these cases, the irrationality of the demand does not fall on the capacities, but on the being itself. In addition, its origin is always in the environment of the person.
Answer:
B. Notes Receivable.
Explanation:
Since the company is signed an agreement for lending out of its customers for $200,000 that could be repaid in one year at 5% interest so it is not revenue not note payable and also not account receivable
Therefore it is a note receivable
Hence, the option b is correct
and, the same is to be considered and relevant
