Phrenologists did not critically examine their data.
not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
Answer:
C. Often requires many years of study, training, and practical counselling experience.
Explanation:
Synthesizing the approaches covered in the text are time-consuming and require in-depth knowledge and practical experience. Otherwise, the results turn out to be ineffective and meaningless. This is why it requires a lot of study, training, and first-hand experience in the field of counselling. If you do not go through any of these then you would be unable to carry out the process in a proper manner in practical life.
Adware is a program that gathers information about your surfing habits without your knowledge.
<h3>What's habits?</h3>
- A habit( or habit as a humorous and formal term) is a routine of geste that's repeated regularly and tends to do subconsciously.
- The American Journal of Psychology( 1903) defined a" habit, from the viewpoint of psychology, a more or less fixed way of thinking, willing, or feeling acquired through former reiteration of a internal experience."
- Habits are occasionally mandatory.
<h3>Why are habits so important?</h3>
- Habits are essential to our health.
- They can make or break your chances of achieving and maintaining our life pretensions similar as sticking to an eating plan, exercising regularly, and managing diabetes/ other medical conditions, along with adding quality of life and promoting life.
Learn more about habits here:
brainly.com/question/5857190
#SPJ4
Answer: It is a complicated situation, would try to alert her of all the rich that it is illegal, all the possibilities of diseases that the child could have. I could not help but support her but it would be necessary to say that in ethical terms she is very wrong. I would advise you to adopt a child because there are so many children who need love, why spend so much and take so many risks when you have thousands of children who just want to be loved?
