Answer:
The arbitrariness of the sign is a central property of natural language (when regarded as a system of signs) that was emphasized in early European structuralism, esp. ... Linguistic signs are arbitrary insofar as there is no direct link between the form (signifiant) and the meaning (signifié) of a sign.
Explanation:
Cuz he's not up for dating
<h2><u>Q</u><u>u</u><u>e</u><u>s</u><u>t</u><u>i</u><u>o</u><u>n</u><u>↓</u></h2>
Negative aspects of Change
<h2>
<u>A</u><u>n</u><u>s</u><u>w</u><u>e</u><u>r</u><u>↓</u></h2>
<h3>
Negative:</h3>
- Inequality, both domestic and international, because of insufficient protections against exploitation. I say this is well worth the price.
- For some countries the loss of domestic industry, which has benefited developing nations immensely (including mine), but I am of the opinion that the paramount interests that policies and resources of a nation should serve are that of its citizens.
- Environmental degradation
- Imperative need for stronger international authorities, like the UN, which will be difficult even on a theoretical level.
- Globalisation is established under a set of rules when many nations didn’t even exist yet, but under international law, are bound to its rules by default.
<u>H</u><u>o</u><u>p</u><u>e</u><u>f</u><u>u</u><u>l</u><u>l</u><u>y</u><u> </u><u>H</u><u>e</u><u>l</u><u>p</u><u>:</u><u>)</u>
- <u>#</u><u>C</u><u>a</u><u>r</u><u>r</u><u>y</u><u>O</u><u>n</u><u>L</u><u>e</u><u>a</u><u>r</u><u>n</u><u>i</u><u>n</u><u>g</u>
Most likely, to make the character be the star of the scene, or to represent that everything is going well, or he is happy.
When you move to a new place, do you get confused if you do not understand the language there? What did you do then?