Answer:
not totally sure bout the first but here you go:
Explanation:
1st question 2nd choice
2nd question 1st choice
hope im not late to answer
The "subversiveness" of the characters can be presented with real-life examples that show how children behave and think. These characters were portrayed too unreal and innocent before the publication of "Where the Wild Things Are."
The question above does not show the article to which it refers, but it is possible to see that it refers to the works of writer Maurice Sendak. Accordingly, we can answer the questions with the following information:
- Maurice Sendak wrote children's books that revolutionized the children's literature market.
- Their books featured characters with realistic behaviors that can be found in any real-life children.
- That's because Maurice Sendak wrote characters that children could identify with, not characters that showed what adults expected of children.
Although praised by critics, Maurice Sendak had his work considered controversial, because it showed subversive and rebellious characters, in some ways. That's because, before he released his most famous work, "Where the Wild Things Are," the characters in children's books were quite innocent, obedient, without much personality.
More information:
brainly.com/question/404382?referrer=searchResults
This is an argument, because Obama is striving to prove that America needs a new strategy for energy. In this argument he uses logos when he gives the audience specific statistics to support his point. He also uses pathos when he appeals to the emotions of the audience, the emotion of hope for a brighter and cleaner future.
Answer:
yes, because it is giving life or human qualities to something not human/ able to move
