Answer:
The U.S. government made reservations the centerpiece of Indian policy around 1850, and thereafter reserves became a major bone of contention between natives and non-natives in the Pacific Northwest. However, they did not define the lives of all Indians. Many natives lived off of reservations, for example. One estimate for 1900 is that more than half of all Puget Sound Indians lived away from reservations. Many of these natives were part of families that included non-Indians and children of mixed parentage, and most worked as laborers in the non-Indian economy. They were joined by Indians who migrated seasonally away from reservations, and also from as far away as British Columbia. As Alexandra Harmon's article "Lines in Sand" makes clear, the boundaries between "Indian" and "non-Indian," and between different native groups, were fluid and difficult to fix. Reservations could not bound all Northwest Indians any more than others kinds of borders and lines could.
The right answer is "A. the children who had seen the film behaved more aggressively with toys and sometimes showed almost exact imitations of rocky". This example is based on the theory of observational learning, this type of learning happens when we first learn by observing and then imitating the behavior of other people. It is the most common type of learning.
I hope my ans
Although some cases are decided based on written briefs alone, many cases are selected for an "oral argument" before the court. Oral argument in the court of appeals is a structured discussion between the appellate lawyers and the panel of judges focusing on the legal principles in dispute. Each side is given a short time — usually about 15 minutes — to present arguments to the court.
The Canadian Parliamement was shaped after the British one, which is why its lower house is called the House of Commons (rather than the House of Representatives, like in the US), but it's upper house is called the Senate, like in the US - the correct answer is B.
