Rainsford does not believe animals and people are the same. Here he claims that he is a hunter and that if General Zaroff hunts people, he is a murderer. This implies that Rainsford does not feel as if killing animals matters or that they feel anything at all the way humans do. He believes that a kill for sport can only be considered murder if it is a human being killed.
Earlier on in the short story, he also mentions directly to Whitney that he believes animals feel differently than humans do, and that their lives do not matter in the way his and Whitney's do.
Italics do not show up on this site, but "D. Have you read Ambrose Bierce's short story An Occurence at Owl Creek Bridge" works as long as "An Occurence at Owl Creek Bridge" is in italics.
1. provide the topic of the paragraph. This sentence provides your main point (or argument). What is your answer to the prompt?
The topic is that a girl (I assume) fell in love with the minister's son, Robert, and she is afraid of how he'll think of her/judge her.
2. provides an example, evidence, a quote, or a paraphrase to support your topic sentence. What quote supports your argument?
"What would Robert think of our shabby Chinese Christmas? What would he think of our noisy Chinese relatives who lacked proper American manners? "
3. In your own words, explain the quote. How does the evidence or quote prove the answer from your topic sentence?
The quote proves that the main character is scared to know how Robert will react to herself and her family when he comes over for dinner on Christmas Eve.
4. Why is it important? Make connections to the text.
It's important because it's the main conflict in the story.
(I hope this helps!)
Explanation:
Helen Frangedis is a high school teacher that always includes The Catcher in the Rye in her course syllabus for the year. Parents are always concerned about the book because of the profanity, drug and alcohol references, and “loose moral codes”. When presented with these concerns, Frangedis states that there is a deeper meaning in the book and the students have the challenge of finding it. She addresses her audience of parents with good reasons of reading and analyzing the book, while understanding their concerns.
Frangedis’s article focuses entirely on J. D. Salenger’s writing style. Salenger greatly exaggerates Holden, his issues, and society throughout the book and that leads to all of the profanity and drug/alcohol references. With his writing style, people began to notice, read, and criticize “The Catcher in the Rye,” all because of one reason; Salenger’s exaggerating writing style. Society always pays attention to the bigger, more exaggerated, stunning news. For example, people will pay more attention to the semi-truck that flipped over than the car that hit a pole. The reason is simple. Watching the truck flip over is more stunning and impressive than a car hit something. The same goes for “The Catcher in the Rye”. People will read a book that is full of drugs, cursing, and drinking over the book that is nice, short, and sweet. Knowing who society is and how it works, Salenger wrote a book that not only goes against society, but separates him from all other authors.
It’s c because u always put a comma after the action
