The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
Answer: Probably C
Explanation: Isnt this on Compass learning?
Answer:
First Amendment rights of free speech and press, peaceful assembly, and to petition the government
Explanation:
Answer:
ethical dilemma
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Davis is facing an ethical dilemma. This refers to a problem in which there may or may not be a morally correct choice, and if there is then that choice may not be the most logically correct choice. Which is what Davis is facing, since he can choose the logical choice which would be to demand a better manufacturing unit, but by doing so it will cause a raise in the prices of necessary pharmaceuticals that people will not be able to afford, which would be morally wrong.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
