That would be considered A. explicit memory. Hope this helps!
The fifteenth amendent of the US constitution
Answer:
Virgil explains how due to Beatrice desire´s he is in hell guiding Dante.
Explanation:
For Virgil the fact that Dante compares with Aeneas and Paul turns out to be hurtful, since the first was the inspiration in the poem of his composition as he was the founder of Rome, and the second was one of the saints of his great admiration to be The founder of the Church.
In this sonnet Dante expresses his feelings of fear and conviction; he believes that he will become the next Aeneas or Paul after passing through hell, he really thinks something relevant will happen after.
Given these statements by Dante, Virgil explains the reason for his stay and guidance for his passage in hell, he tells her how Beatrice was in charge of this feat, since thanks to her wishes and sacrifices for the love of Dante, Beatrice he asks Virgil to guide his way through that place.
Answer:
D. they resisted fought three wars against the United States government.
Explanation:
At that time, the Chictaw ans Cherokee choose not to spilled any more blood to their already diminishing population (difference in weapons/technology was really hard for them to overcome). So they force themselves to move to the west even though it's really hard for them.
But the Seminole chose a different approach. They did not want their ancestor's land to fall without a fight. So they resisted fought three wars against the United States government before eventually loss the battle.
The following is missing for the question to be complete:
A. Utilitarianism
B. Social responsibility
C. Consumerism
D. Preconventional morality
E. Distributive justice
Answer: A. Utilitarianism
Explanation: Utilitarianism is the doctrine according to which any procedure, rule, action, is good and useful if it suits the majority. According to this doctrine, the happiness and satisfaction of the majority should be the guide to which rules and norms should be harmonised. So, from the point of view of this doctrine, it is morally wrong to deprive most people of a popular student restaurant. It would be moral to meet the needs of the majority, to make the majority happy, and so the student restaurant would have usefulness, that is utility, hence the name of this doctrine. So the moral decision of what is good and what is wrong is made based on the outcome of the action or decision, and the outcome is good if it satisfies the majority.
