This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question
Based on your reading of the Challenger case, do you think the advocacy or inquiry approach dominated the decision-making process?
Answer: advocacy approach
Explanation:
The fact that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) had dismissed probabilistic risk analyses has been pointed out as the main cause of the Challenger catastrophe. In this case, advocacy dominated the inquiry approach, as management didn´t allow further inquires in probabilistic risk analysis, prioritizing the design-oriented approach that predominated in NASA during the 1970s.
England sent warships to take over the nEtherlands in 1664. Along with Sweden Britain, France, and Holland. Hope this helps!
Yes, Like most strategic bombing during World War II, the aim of the air offensive against Japan was to destroy the enemy's war industries, kill or disable civilian employees of these industries, and undermine civilian morale. If a means is justified by an end, the use of the atomic bomb was justified for it brought Japan to her knees and ended the horrible war. If the war had gone longer, without the use of the atomic bomb, how many thousands and thousands of helpless men, women and children would have needlessly died and suffered ...?
Hope this helps ❤❤
