Answer:
The Communist regime believed that collectivization would improve agricultural productivity and would produce grain reserves sufficiently large to feed the growing urban labor force. ... Forced collectivization helped achieve Stalin's goal of rapid industrialization, but the human costs were incalculable
Explanation:
Relative location is same with predicitive
And it is determined through longitude and latitude and
Absolute which is same as predictive location
Uses description of nearby place
In short, Libertarians believe the government should never violate an individuals rights (socially liberal), and should be extremely limited its power, especially in regards to the economy (economically conservative).
Carried forward, Libertarians generallysupport gay rights, a woman's right to choose ("pro-choice"), and an individuals privacy (opposed to the Patriot Act, and to a degree also opposed to the CIA). Anything that expands the individuals' rights, Libertarians support.
Economically, Libertarians generally believe that Capitalism should be unregulated. There are some blatant problems with monopoly and scams (i.e. Ponzi schemes), and a certain number of Libertarians believe there ought to be some regulation.
In a similar vein, Libertarians generally are opposed to the power of the monopoly called government. As a political philosophy, Libertarians believe the government should exist only to protect the liberties of its citizens. A strong military is acceptable, but Libertarians favor the philosophy of the founding fathers - nonintervention.
These "policies" are only as I understand them, and should not be taken as representative of all Libertarians.
Answer: The flexible answer required more money.
Explanation:
During the 1960s, the US continued to expand its strategic goals and invest in conventional military forces. The flexible answer also involved seeking partners in third world countries.
To this end, financial assistance was provided to governments that did not favor the communist regime. So the flexible answer was not to spend money on the military but to strengthen the position in the world. As a result, the US found itself at a much higher cost.