Answer:
B
Explanation:
Because Hinton chose not to write in first-person, we don't have Ponyboy's bias in the narrative. Through Hinton, we know what Ponyboy is thinking, but it's kind of like looking at his thoughts through a glass wall instead of <em>becoming</em> Ponyboy in the story. If that makes any sense. I did my best to explain.
Hope this helped :)
The original sentence used the pronoun in a wrong way - the way that sentence is written, it would seem that the table needed washing, and not the dishes. The revised sentence fixes this mistake by placing the pronoun nearer the antecedent.
An antecedent is a word or a phrase which is located in front of the pronoun (ante means before) and which that pronoun refers to. The pronoun here is 'that,' and its antecedent is 'the dishes.' So by moving the pronoun 'that' nearer the antecedent 'the dishes' we fixed the ambiguous sentence.
The answer is B. By writing the story from Clark's point of view, Willa Cather <span>keeps readers from knowing what Aunt Georgiana truly feels. The first person point of view limits the perspective of readers into Clark Hamilton's thoughts and how he sees Aunt Georgiana. Only the author knows what the aunt will do in the future.</span>
Answer:
the answer is the second option
If you plan to list the arguments from either weakest to strongest or strongest to weakest, yes that is order of importance.
