Answer:
No, it is not fair to let financial pressures determine how much we are willing to spend to promote justice and public safety.
Explanation:
No, it is not appropriate to let financial pressures ascertain how much we are willing to contribute to promoting justice and public security.
Spending on justice and public safety is an essential public expense, an expense that is needed to maintain the composition of our enlightened society. Let’s consider the example of a correctional institution. Such an institution works towards the restoration of offenders. These institutions have to struggle with unlawful justice bureaus for funding. They also have to struggle with social welfare divisions like education for funding.
Now correctional bureaus help in advancing justice and public safety. If funding is freed from the restraints of financial pressures then these bureaus will be necessary for supporting public security and supporting justice.
Answer:
D. Strategies and goals that guide a nation's relations with other countries
Answer:
its b kdkdkdkdkdkdksdjdjd
The principal of justice could be described as the moral obligation to act on the basis of fair adjudication between competing claims. As such, it is linked to fairness, entitlement and equality.
Answer:
I felt that dude. I have similar problems with my mom (not gonna say what).
It starts counting as an actual threat when it is repeated and continuously said. Also if he has the actual capabilities of doing so and begins to act on them.
If you can, when he is calm- maybe ease into asking him about it. See what he says.
I don't know if you have a mom, parents are divorced, whatever it is- but if you can speak to your mother about it, I would try.
Explanation:
