The
correct answer is Transcontinental Railroad
The Transcontinental Railroad affect westward expansion by
making it easier for settlers to move west and also promoted westward expansion
more than anything else.
The Transcontinental railroad encouraged settlement and
stimulated tremendous economic growth in western growth
The best answer is C.
The south depended too much on the plantation system and slave economy which was labor intensive as opposed to the north which was rapidly becoming mechanized , with production of agricultural products and manufacture of goods creating a major economic stride forward.
Though they produced two thirds of the world's cotton, the south had little manufacturing capability. They only had about 29% of the railroad tracks and only 13% of the nation's banks.
Free states attracted the vast majority of the waves of European immigrants. The North had 23 million people as compared to 9 million in the south which negatively impacted the southern economy but positively impacted the northern economy.
I'm sorry for late response, but for future, it was C: <span>Both used mass protests to get their message to leaders and the public.</span>
Answer:
In the first phase, clearance resulted from agricultural improvement, driven by the need for landlords to increase their income (many landlords had crippling debts, with bankruptcy playing a large part in the history). This involved the enclosure of the open fields managed on the run rig system and the shared grazing. Especially in the North and West of the region, these were usually replaced with large-scale pastoral farms stocked with sheep, on which much higher rents were paid, with the displaced tenants getting alternative tenancies in newly created crofting communities, where they were expected to be employed in industries such as fishing, quarrying or the kelp industry. The reduction in status from farmer to crofter was one of the causes of resentment from these changes.
Explanation:
he eviction of tenants went against dùthchas, the principle that clan members had an inalienable right to rent land in the clan territory. This was never recognised in Scottish law. It was gradually abandoned by clan chiefs as they began to think of themselves simply as commercial landlords, rather than as patriarchs of their people—a process that arguably started with the Statutes of Iona of 1609. The clan members continued to rely on dùthchas. This different viewpoint was an inevitable source of grievance.35–36, 39, 60, 300 The actions of landlords varied. Some did try to delay or limit evictions, often to their financial cost. The Countess of Sutherland genuinely believed her plans were advantageous for those resettled in crofting communities and could not understand why tenants complained. A few landlords displayed complete lack of concern for evicted tenants.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
John Locke believed that if the government failed to provide their natural rights, then the people have the power to overthrow the government. Locke views natural rights as given to the human by birth and by God, cannot be taken by the government or monarch. Locke states that people should be free to make choices about how to manage their own lives as long as they do not intervene with others.
