1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kozerog [31]
3 years ago
6

Using UCR/NIBRS as a measurement basis, compare the national figures for the following crimes with those reported in the NCVS an

d Self-Report/Offender surveys. What accounts for the differences?
A. auto theft
B. murder
C. drug use
D. prostitution
E. domestic violence
Law
2 answers:
lianna [129]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Using UCR/NIBRS as a measurement basis, compare the national figures for the following crimes with those reported in the NCVS and Self-Report/Offender surveys. What accounts for the differences?

B. murder

Goryan [66]3 years ago
5 0
The answer to this would be be murder
You might be interested in
Which best describes the role of a coroner at a crime scene?
Anettt [7]
A. Determines cause of death
5 0
3 years ago
According to the segment, which of the following is NOT true of juvenile courts?
Dvinal [7]
I’m pretty sure it’s A
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Law that establishes a ban on writing threats to the President of the United Stateswould most likely receive the following type
Eduardwww [97]

Answer: Strict Scrutiny

Explanation:

Strict Scrutiny can be defined as the highest form of judicial review,

which court uses to determine whether some certain laws are within the constitution. Strict scrutiny is widely and mostly used by the competent court of law when the government is sued by the accuser. The law also establishes a ban on some contents, which includes writing of threats to the President of the United States.

5 0
3 years ago
Who was responsible for passing the Canadian bill of rights?
solniwko [45]

Answer:

John Diefenbaker

Explanation:

I searched itup

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did muller v oregon impact future cases?
Stella [2.4K]

Answer: Muller v. Oregon, one of the most important U.S. Supreme Court cases of the Progressive Era, upheld an Oregon law limiting the workday for female wage earners to ten hours. The case established a precedent in 1908 to expand the reach of state activity into the realm of protective labor legislation.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which restrictions have been foundations for lawsuits against law enforcement<br> agencies?
    5·1 answer
  • Why do you think the authors of the Fourth Amendment required law enforcement officers to establish probable cause before making
    11·1 answer
  • David lives under the rule of a single king, who has unlimited legal power over his subjects. David lives under an absolute mona
    5·2 answers
  • What is the difference between justification and excuse defense
    8·2 answers
  • Can someone give me topics that I can use to a create a bill for a class project
    10·2 answers
  • You are driving your vehicle and you see this traffic sign, one lane bridge. This means the bridge ahead is wide enough for only
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following are processes by which state judges can be removed from office?
    14·2 answers
  • Briefly describe what Marks says in the beginning of his talk about conflict and compromise.
    5·1 answer
  • At an open or uncontrolled intersection, yeild if ????
    6·1 answer
  • Help me answer these please
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!