He wanted to convey that indifference is worse than hate or anger. One could be angry at injustice or hate evil, violent acts Indifference is the absence of compassion and implies something worse than outright hate; indifference implies a lack of acknowledgment. Being indifferent to another's suffering is like saying, 'you're suffering is not even worth my consideration.' Wiesel speaks from his experience of the Holocaust, but this could be applied to any situation in history in which the world was indifferent; in which the world willfully refused to acknowledge suffering of others for any number of unjustifiable reasons: 1) out of sight, out of mind, 2) passivity, laziness, 3) an untried feeling of hopelessness ('what could i possibly do?'), 4) selfishness. When Wiesel speaks of indifference he also means ignorance in 3 senses: 1) ignorant as in lacking sensitivity, 2) lacking knowledge and 3) ignoring. The 'perils of indifference' could be described as the 'the terrible outcomes of ignoring atrocities. Apply this to anything today, where suffering is ignored by indifferent people and governments. (i.e., Darfur, Haiti). The peril of indifference would be to allow (allow by ignoring = indifference) an atrocity like the Holocaust to occur again.
<span>The item that would be considered a musician's medium is D. song. A medium is the means through which, in this case, a musician communicates with his or her audience. So, the way that the musician wants to convey a message is through a medium in the form of a song that they prepare and sing to the people who want to hear it. </span>
The correct answer, is b. Becoming greedy, and reaching for too much, can result in losing everything.
Indeed, Pahom becomes too greedy to understand that he already had a very comfortable situation and that he did not need that much land. Because he overreaches for as much land as he can physically cover as he runs, he dies of exhaustion, losing all the good things he already have, including his own life.
D. It attacks the opposition's evidence so they cannot prove their point.
If you point out one of your opponent's facts and then show how it is wrong you are strengthening the proof of your own point. You are showing that you have done the research into your opponent's side but understand how your point is still stronger.
Answer:
I would say A because it makes the least amount of sense. All of the other ones are complete sentences
Explanation:
Sorry if its wrong. Have a great day love! :)
