individual preferences is the answer
The last day to get exercise the option and receive the dividend is two business days prior to the record date. The customer can also exercise his dividend claim two business days prior to the ex-date or one business date prior to the ex-date. The only option not available to him is one business day prior to the record date.
An option is a right available to a shareholder to buy a particular stock of which he has bought a call option at an agreed price. This option can be exercised by the holder to purchase the share at any given date and at a price that is agreed upon. The option holder requires to be eligible for dividends,
Dividends are declared as a benefit to shareholders of a company. The options holder will have to purchase the shares before the record date and will be eligible to receive a dividend.
1. Learn more about the call option here:
brainly.com/question/20732384
2. Learn more about dividends here:
brainly.com/question/15395112
#SPJ4
Answer:
option B
Explanation:
Prime costs refers to the expenses of a company directly linked to the labor and materials used during manufacturing. This relates to the expense of a product made, which is measured to provide a business with the highest profit margin.
A prime cost is really the cumulative direct costs of producing a commodity for sale, which can be constant or adjustable. Companies utilize prime costs as more of a method of measuring the overall cost of the development materials required to create a specific output.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is B .
Answer: the question is: How do you measure whether both the policy and the right processes were followed?
Explanation:
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
- Breach of duty.
- Strict liability.
- Recklessness.
- Negligence per se
And this is the correct answer:
Explanation:
Negligence per se consist in act that is neglectful, or unlawful, because it explicitely violates a statue or regulation.
In this case, the statue was the new state law that required smoke detectors to be maintained. The company that installed the smoke detector inside Jose's house clearly did not maintain the detector because otherwise, it would have gone off when the fire started, and Jose probably would not have died.
It is a negligence per se from the smoke detector company, and Jose's wife can lawfully sue them for that very reason.
