Answer: C is correct (overthrow any government that in not a democracy).
Explanation: Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted in 1948 by United Nations (not signed by all the member states of UN) attributed to humans/citizens many human and civil rights. Respecting these rights means rejecting whatever sort of of undemocratic government. Countries like Czechoslovakia, USSR or South Africa did not sign (for obvious reasons).
It depends on the person, but most of the time, they were too scared of what would happen if they were to do anything. However the fact that watching others get punished didn't help wither.
Answer:
No it's not appropriate.
Explanation:
The President nominates someone for a vacancy on the Court and the Senate votes to confirm the nominee, which requires a simple majority. In this way, both the Executive and Legislative Branches of the federal government have a voice in the composition of the Supreme Court.
So here the interplay of supply and demand influences the dealings of the private business which means that it's not centrally decided but rather market analysis is done to determine what is needed.
So I would say the best answer is: market forces!
If the head of the business was not looking to the market, but rather making central decisions, we could call it "central planning "
