1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
blondinia [14]
4 years ago
11

compare and contrast each of these 3 rebel fighters jose marti, emilio aguinaldo, and francinso "pancho" villa explain the backg

rounds, motivations amd actions of nationalist
History
1 answer:
Lilit [14]4 years ago
8 0
They all battled for their opportunity. Trusted that they ought to have the capacity to be free. They simply all did it extraordinary and in various parts of the world. Martí needed to free Cuban's. He was a Cuban nationalist. He battled for autonomy and made war, for opportunity. Emilio was a Philippian patriot. He needed his opportunity. He enables the Americans in the Spanish-American to war. He helped Americans battle against Spanish so he could be free from Spanish. Manor was a renegade pioneer and help the Mexico. Be that as it may, got pursues for some time until the point that the general surrendered and left.
You might be interested in
How did the counterculture affect american society?
BartSMP [9]
Counterculture brought differ kinds of thinking which might be an effect from the desire to change a society that would favor and accept their conditions. It made American society liberal to accept and hear these changes and transform it into a more democratic country that hears its constituents.
8 0
3 years ago
Why did Britain issue the Proclamation of 1763?
pishuonlain [190]
I am pretty certain it is d
7 0
3 years ago
How did the English Bill of Rights Limit the power of the monarch?
Umnica [9.8K]

Answer: The Bill limits the power of the monarchy by creating a separation of powers, therefore enhancing and protecting the rights of citizens.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help!! This is over the book “if you survive” by George Wilson. It’s suppose to be in essay type form
GarryVolchara [31]

Answer:

#4 describe the hurtgen forest...

Wilson's leadership and tactical skills were sharpened in the hurtgen because of his previous experience with differing terrain conditions on the battlefield. hurtgen was a heavily wooded forest located on the German Belgian border he described it as a hundred square mile force of steep hills rough ridges and deep ravines. the forest had low visibility. wilson didn't think digging trenches was the answer I'm this location but he thought moving further up the hill because gullies were natural targets for German artillery and he was right because the area was soon shelled and luckily the troops were not there. he followed his tactical skills and he considered the dense terrain. he suggested that attacking in a column of platoons would work that way we can have our men closer together we can control them and we can defend better. Wilson relied on scouts and radioing ahead to other regiments to communicate about enemy.movement. He had his troops create fields of fire which allowed them to clear brush and cut off tree limbs that might otherwise obscure or obstruct their view of the enemy. The field of fire we're not large open Fields but rather small clearings and meadows that allowed them to be within the woods but able to fire out to the open area beyond. finally Wilson ordered that his company take the small village of gross house it was a key to rain because it was vital to their attack plans they took the town easily and chose an avenue of approach that was unprotected and surprised the Germans from behind the town function as a command post for upcoming attacks.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of these issues was addressed by the Carter administration?
podryga [215]

Answer:

<h2>Welfare reform</h2>

Explanation:

In his campaign, Jimmy Carter had frequently asserted, ""If I'm elected president, you're going to have welfare reform next year."  He promised to replace the problems of the existing system with one that would encourage work and family life, and that would "reflect both the competence and compassion of the American people."  In August, 1977, President Jimmy Carter announced his proposals for reforming the welfare system in the United States.  

However, President Carter's plan did not win support in Congress, and in fact never received a vote in Congress.

So welfare reform most definitely was a key issue for the Carter administration and addressed by his administration, but his reform plans were not enacted into law.

Note: The same thing could also be said about tax reform.  The Carter administration proposed tax reform legislation which also was rejected by Congress.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was james oglethorpe important for jewish settlement in the trustie period?
    15·1 answer
  • Why does fed pay interest to banks?
    11·1 answer
  • Between 1915 and 1920, when u.s. consumption doubled, the west coast developed a famine or shortage of what liquid?
    9·1 answer
  • Help me with number 2 please emergency!
    6·1 answer
  • ¿cuales son las principales ideas del liberalismo de los hispanoamericano?​
    10·1 answer
  • What was the most significant result of the Spanish colonization of Central and South America?
    8·1 answer
  • What impact did roman mythology have on western civilization?
    8·1 answer
  • Was the end of the west the end of native american history?
    9·1 answer
  • I need help nobody helping me come on i help yall when yall need help and now yall cant help me come on now! can you pls help me
    10·1 answer
  • REVIEW LESSON 2
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!