1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
blondinia [14]
3 years ago
11

compare and contrast each of these 3 rebel fighters jose marti, emilio aguinaldo, and francinso "pancho" villa explain the backg

rounds, motivations amd actions of nationalist
History
1 answer:
Lilit [14]3 years ago
8 0
They all battled for their opportunity. Trusted that they ought to have the capacity to be free. They simply all did it extraordinary and in various parts of the world. Martí needed to free Cuban's. He was a Cuban nationalist. He battled for autonomy and made war, for opportunity. Emilio was a Philippian patriot. He needed his opportunity. He enables the Americans in the Spanish-American to war. He helped Americans battle against Spanish so he could be free from Spanish. Manor was a renegade pioneer and help the Mexico. Be that as it may, got pursues for some time until the point that the general surrendered and left.
You might be interested in
Which challenge did Thomas Nast face during his efforts to expose the corruption of Tammany Hall?
schepotkina [342]

The correct answer is:  

B.The Tammany Hall bosses tried to bribe him and threatened his life.

Thomas Nast rose to fame in the late 1860s when his satirical comics led directly to the arrest of Boss Tweed, for the corrupted “Tweed Ring” he ran in New York City bribing city officials, rigging elections, and corrupting the judiciary.

Tweed attempted to bribe Nast offering him up to $500,000 to study art in Europe. Failing to bribe Nast, Tweed threatened to have the Board of Elections boycott Harper’s books, where Nast worked, but the magazine´s board chose to support the cartoonist depicting Tweed as a thief.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Check Understanding In invalidating preclearance provisions, what larger point was the Supreme Court making about voting rights?
Ksenya-84 [330]
The Supreme Court was affirming the point that states (not the federal government) should be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.

The Supreme Court decision you're referring to, which invalidated pre-clearance conditions, was Shelby County v. Holder (2013).  "Pre-clearance" meant that certain states, according to the Voting Rights Acts of 1965, had to get approval in advance from federal authorities for any changes they made to their state regulations regarding voting.  That standard had been applied to several states because they had displayed discriminatory practice in their voting laws.  The decision in Shelby County v. Holder held that the federal government could not keep applying that requirement on the basis of decades-old data.

I recently posted another answer on Shelby County v. Holder, which you can check out too.  Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/9069264#readmore
8 0
3 years ago
What was one reason for the Decloration of Independence
Naily [24]
So we could have freedom from the British
5 0
2 years ago
“We want to achieve a new and better order in society: in this new and better society there must be neither rich nor poor: all w
dybincka [34]

Answer:

c. Communist Revolution in Russia.

Explanation:

  • At the beginning of the 20th century, Russia was one of the most backward states of Europe.
  • Although feudalism was formally abolished, it remained a semi-feudal state with a very strong emperor power.
  • In addition to Turkey, the last of the great powers passed a constitution (1906), and reforms were difficult to implement. With this system, no one was happy.
  • The material appropriations for the war made the position of the impoverished Russian people even more difficult. The food shortage, their smuggling and the massive casualties on the Eastern Front led to revolutions during 1917.
  • The first was in February - the overthrow of the imperial system and the seduction of Parliamentarism, and the second in October, where civil Parliamentarism was overthrown and a new, socialist social order was established.
4 0
3 years ago
What is a conclusion paragraph?
Gennadij [26K]

Answer:

You summarize what you've written about in your paper.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Travel in the early 1800s was much the same as it had been during colonial times.
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these is most important to success in your job?
    12·1 answer
  • PLS ANSWER ASAP!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the effects of technology, birth rate, and life expectancy on population growth, and predict the challenges that countri
    15·2 answers
  • George washington was the first president of the united states. true or false.
    11·1 answer
  • Dual You TuSwimu
    11·1 answer
  • What is the "no pass, no play" rule and why is it controversial?
    6·1 answer
  • Were census takers first sent to central England, or to lands along the eastern coast?
    5·1 answer
  • Using complete sentences explain how people living in extremely cold climates have adapted their building methods to suit their
    9·2 answers
  • Plz hurry// Consider this thesis statement: “Frederick Douglass contributed to the abolitionist movement by describing his exper
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!