The differences in the wild and hatcheries make it so the different salmon adapt differently and have different traits.
If salmon are split up into different habitats, one being in the wild and one being in captivity, they will eventually have different adaptations from each other and their offspring will develop traits that are better suited for their environment.
Wild salmon and salmon that are raised in captivity are going to be very different from each other. The salmon in captivity do not have to actively hunt for their food, be wary of certain predators, or may not want to reproduce.
Taking these factors into account, it is very possible that the salmon raised in captivity will have reduced reproductive success compared to the salmon that thrive in the wild. Along with this, they would most likely have many genetic differences from each other and other traits that better adapt to their living situations.
Here is the answer to your question.
<span>French- did not colonize- fur trade, accept indians, purpose- to amass wealth for country
Dutch- did not colonize- fur trade, encourage Europeans to colonize, accept indians, purpose- to amass wealth for country
English- colonize, sought religious freedom, purpose- to amass wealth for country
</span>
That’s the Monroe doctrine, which basically said that the Americas were closed to anymore colonization from European powers.
The answer is A the first option. Hope this helps
Answer:
Both of the people mentioned above were known philosopher who have said different opinion regarding how a government should be run and how to interpret social contract.
For me personally, I feel social contract is a set of agreement that's not necessarily written within the law. But, this agreement need to be carried out by all people in society in order to maintain peace and order.
Humans are inherently selfish organism. We tend to act based our own interest. But if we always follow that interest , there's a chance when we might hurt other people in the process.
Social contract basically an agreement that make us agree to prevent ourselves to pursue some of that interest, and let ourselves be ruled by Laws which determine the things that we can and cannot do. Government and the people have to act accordingly to this set of laws to prevent chaos from occurring.
