Answer:
The Answer is D: Nominal group technique
Explanation:
From the question, it is clear that the CEO of Mi Ola is encouraging everyone to bring up that idea they have in mind. She is encouraging everyone to make a decision as it is never wrong as long as you're moving. Bounded rationality talks about making rational decisions that will most likely satisfy personal needs. This does not seem to be the kind of statement made here. The statement is like a booster to everyone to come up with ideas, which bring us to the concept of nominal group technique. This technique encourages contributions from an entire team and encourages swift agreement on the relative significance of problems, issues, and solutions.
Answer:
With reference to the above scenario, "big ideas":
could become the bases of creative and successful advertising campaigns.
Explanation:
- The 1st option is not correct as the statement "big ideas are impossible to develop as they are not applicable to retail chains" is not correct because ideas are required by every company.
- The statement which states that big ideas are only needed in advertising for consumer services is not correct as every industry needs advertising.
- The statement which states that big ideas are typically not the bases for effective advertising campaigns is also incorrect as big ideas are necessary fro effective advertising campaigns.
- Big ideas are not limited to the advertisement of business to business scenario yet they are applicable to every kind of advertisement.
- So the statement which states that big ideas can become the bases of creative and successful advertising campaigns is correct.
Explanation:
The computation of the future value is shown below:
As we know that
Future value = Present value × (1 + interest rate)^number of years
In the first case,
Future value = $2,050 × (1 + 0.12)^12
= $2,050 × 3.895975993
= $7,986.75
In the second case,
Future value = $8,352 × (1 + 0.10)^6
= $8,352 × 1.771561
= $14,796.08
In the third case,
Future value = $72,355× (1 + 0.11)^13
= $72,355 × 3.883280163
= $280,974.74
In the fourth case,
Future value = $179,796 × (1 + 0.07)^7
= $179,796 × 1.605781476
= $288,713.09
A. Raymond applied for the position, and he was called for an interview two days later.
(This sentence has more than one subject and a predicate, hence is a compound sentence)
