Answer: c. legal but unethical
Explanation:
With John being in charge of the loan application when Albert came to apply, John had access to Albert's information.
John then used this information which he had LEGAL access to, to recommend a bank product to Albert.
This is legal but UNETHICAL because Albert did not know that any information he gave will be used for a reason different from his application for a loan.
The answer would be between A and D.
Explanation:
This is a complex issue that may reflect on the organizational culture of that company. As a leader, it is necessary to understand the situation and listen to both parties in order to find a favorable solution for the company and the employees. Since Marshall's work is important to the company, firing him at first may not be a favorable decision, what the leader can do is provide feedback to him about his interpersonal relationship at the company.
As an effective leader, it is necessary to constantly monitor the work and the relationship between employees, in which case it is necessary to understand the reason for Marshall's behavior and try to change the parameters and procedures that may be facilitating this behavior. It is necessary for him to understand that despite being an effective worker, the company is an integrated system that must be in perfect synchronicity for it to be successful in the market.
What the leader could do in this case then is to try to change the code of organizational ethics, seek training and psychological assistance for Marshall if necessary, talk to the workers who are part of the conflict to understand the situation in the best way, to seek a work redesign. , etc.
The answer to your question is the vacuole it holds water. the vacuole is responsible for helping the plant stay up right when the vacuole is full the plant is perky and vibrant but when it is empty the plant becomes dull and wilted
