1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SVEN [57.7K]
3 years ago
15

Which of the following represents a true statement?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Eva8 [605]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

BABE JUST USE A CSLCULATOR!! :)

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Please simplify this
alexandr1967 [171]

Answer:

root 10

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Answer the question below, select all that apply. And I'd pick give u more points if I got correct.
antiseptic1488 [7]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  1. A and B: 1/4x, x -3/4x
  2. A and C: 8/5x, x +3/5x

Step-by-step explanation:

The wording of these questions is ambiguous, and <em>should be avoided</em>. Statements describing amounts "more" (or "farther") or "less" usually are describing a quantity that is in the original measure.

For example, "2 kegs and 3 more" would generally be interpreted to mean 5 kegs.

An exception to this interpretation is usually intended when percentages are involved. "2 kegs and 50% more" would generally be interpreted to mean 3 kegs, the original 2 plus 50% of 2, or 1 more. This is most often seen in pricing, where percentages are used to express markups or discounts.

Here, the notion of (some amount) and (some fraction) more (or less) could mean that a fraction of the original unit is being added (or subtracted). Or, it could mean that a fraction of the original quantity is being added (or subtracted). That is, we could interpret "2 kegs and 1/2 more" to mean 2 1/2 kegs, or 2 +(1/2)(2) = 3 kegs. It is this ambiguity that is present in these questions.

__

For these answers, we will (reluctantly) interpret the fraction to mean a fraction of the original <em>quantity</em>, not the original <em>unit</em>.

1. 3/4 of x fruit snacks will be 3/4x. When that amount is subtracted from x, we have ...

  x - 3/4x = 1/4x

These expressions match the first and second choices, "A" and "B".

__

2. 3/5 of x miles will be 3/5x miles. When that amount is added to x, we have ...

  x + 3/5x = 8/5x

These expressions match the first and third choices, "A" and "C".

_____

Please be aware that the alternate interpretation is completely legitimate. More context is needed to resolve the ambiguity. (That context may be supplied by examples or rules given in your curriculum materials.) That is, appropriate answers might also be ...

1. x -3/4 (one choice only)  --  assumes 3/4 of a fruit snack

2. x +3/5, 3/5 +x (two choices)  --  assumes 3/5 of a mile

4 0
3 years ago
The system of equations is graphed on the coordinate plane.
Zepler [3.9K]

Answer:

(-1,-2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps!

4 0
4 years ago
Suppose the following are the city driving gas mileages of a selection of sport utility vehicles (SUVs). 19, 20, 19, 20, 18, 21,
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The mean of the gas mileages is 317÷16=19.8125

317 is the sum total of all the figures and 16 is the number of figures in the distribution

Standard deviation is the square root of the variance and the variance is the mean of all squared deviations

The 16 squared deviations are

7.9102(×2) + 3.2852(×2) + 0.6602(×3) + 0.0352(×4) + 1.4102(×3) + 10.1602 + 17.5352 = 56.4382

56.4382÷16 = 3.5274

This is the Variance. The standard deviation is herefore √3.5274 =1.878 ~ 1.88 (to 2 decimal places)

(B) Chebyshev's inequality predicts that 75% of the selection will fall within 2 standard deviations of the mean

2×1.88=3.76

19.8125-3.76 = 16.05

19.8125+3.76= 23.57

The gas mileages are between 16.05 and 23.57

(C) the actual % of SUV models of the sample that fall in the above range is (15/16 × 100) = 93.75%

(D) the empirical rule gives the more accurate prediction

5 0
4 years ago
Exponential growth/decay problem 2
lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

a) decay

b) 2,950,000

c) 0.025

d) f(x)=2950000(0.975)^x

e) 2,409,123

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Part (a)</u>

Exponential DECAY, since the population was decreasing annually.

<u>Part (b)</u>

Initial amount = 2,950,000 people (in the year 2000)

<u>Part (c)</u>

Decay factor = 2.5% = 0.025 (in decimal form)

<u>Part (d)</u>

General form of exponential decay function:

f(x)=a(1-r)^x

where:

  • a = initial amount
  • r = rate of decay (in decimal form)
  • x = time (in years)

Given:

  • a = 2950000
  • r = 0.025

\implies f(x)=2950000(1-0.025)^x

\implies f(x)=2950000(0.975)^x

<u>Part (e)</u>

To determine the city's population in 2008:

x = 2008 - 2000 = 8

\begin{aligned}\implies f(8) & =2950000(0.975)^8\\ & = 2409123\: \sf(nearest\:whole\:number)\end{aligned}

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1.Which fraction is the ratio expressed in simplest form?
    10·1 answer
  • Yesterday, Michelle's Snack Shack went through 3 3/5 bottles of ketchup. If they used 1 3/10 times as much mustard as ketchup, h
    12·1 answer
  • A standard coffee mug has a capacity of 16 fluid ounces if Annie needs to fill 26 mugs with coffee how many total quarts of coff
    5·1 answer
  • Three roots of a fifth degree polynomial function f(x) are –2, 2, and 4 + i. Which statement describes the number and nature of
    7·2 answers
  • (a) 7 : 2<br> what is the answer
    15·2 answers
  • Help help help help help help
    12·1 answer
  • Knock knock? Whos There? My Points
    9·2 answers
  • Maxwell purchased $15,000 worth of 52-week T-Bills for $14,650. What will be the rate of return on his investment?
    14·1 answer
  • Find the amount of interest earned on $5,000 at 15% compounded annually for 10 years. (Round your answer to the nearest dollar.)
    8·1 answer
  • What is the longest line segment that can be drawn in a right rectangular prism that is 15 cm long,
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!