Answer:
In the context of the passage as a whole, the first sentence of the third paragraph ("Yet ... can dom) marks the transition between
A
a brief summary of a debate and a substantive analysis of that debate's origins
B
an empirical investigation and a consideration of its theoretical implications
C
a description of a problem and an assessment of potential solutions
D
an explanation of a viewpoint and a rebuttal of that viewpoint
E
a challenge to a popular thesis and an argument in favor of that thesis
ii
Answer:
Questioned him to gain privileged information.
Explanation:
Towards the end of the passage, we learn from the speaker that Bradford <em>was a crafty old sophister. </em>
<em>Sophisters</em><em> </em>or<em> sophists </em>were pre-Socratic philosophers whose domain of expertise were skills that can be compared to modern day advocacy, manipulating arguments so as to convince their interlocutors of anything at anytime.
The primary meaning of the word <em>art </em>is skill, <em>artful </em>here meaning <em>skillful</em>. If Bradford were a sophister, that would mean he knew just what to say or do, in order to get what he wanted. And it is exactly what he did. He managed to go unnoticed and get the information he wanted from Keimer thanks to his <em>artful questions.</em>
Ok here is the project sorry I didn’t want to type it all out so here is the picture of the work hope it helps
<span>Diamond is an evolutionary biologist, interested in adaptations, and he proceeds to speculate that New Guineans exhibit these heightened-mental-activity traits in response to their environment, which presents them with constant and varied challenges. He gets away with it because (1) this statement is buried inside his main thesis, which is in accord with the fundamental dogma (Western superiority is just an accident of geography), and (2) his superior racial group is non-white, and it's okay to call whites inferior</span>