Title Idea: The Moral of Honesty
Title Idea 2: Honesty is the Best Policy
Main points:
- The king's minister died, so he was looking for a new one.
- He gave three men seeds to grow.
-2 Men cheated by bringing in new plants to look as if they had grown them themselves.
- The other man was honest and brought nothing, in the correct assumption that his honesty would be rewarded.
Moral Lesson:
- Honesty and humbleness will often reap more benefits than deception and arrogance.
Hope this helped!
Answer: Hi there! I read "Harlem" last week in my English class and would love to help you out! Please see the "Explanation" section for a (hopefully) elaborate answer.
Explanation: I wrote a simple version of this poem in bullets.
- If a dream would shrivel like a raisin in the sun, it would change into something so different that it wasn’t before.
- If a dream were to fester a sore, it would irritate and hurt someone badly. This could cause them to do something bad then run away.
- If a dream were to fail and crust over like sugar, that means that the diminished dream doesn't hurt you much.
- If someone would let their dream rot like meat, they’d have to lose all faith and hope, letting their dream go to waste like it was nothing.
- If a dream was to sag like a heavy load, it would slow the person down into thinking more about the dream, instead of working on trying to make the dream come true.
- When a dream doesn’t come true, one can become too stressed and mentally and emotionally explode, leading to an act of self-harm or something one would regret.
What do you think this post (poet??) is saying?
I believe that Langston Hughes' poem best describes the many results of dreams (or ambitions) and how they can affect one's state of mind. Some effects of dreams can be benign while others reveal themselves to be detrimental.
This explanation is just my interpretation, and you are free to disagree with or change anything mentioned. Good luck with your assignment! :)
Answer:
Today's youth is unable to function without technology because of their heavy dependency on it. In today's world we meet people, order food, and even get taxis all from the tiny little thing in our pockets. We carry around a modernized camera, computer, and telephone! Imagine one day it is all gone, how would people be able to do their daily lives or routines without the help of technology? Even our doorbells and digital locks can be controlled from your smartphone! Today's youth have become dependent on technology, more specifically their laptops. Some school-age children use their laptops to attend school, complete work, and even take exams. Certain websites even help us determine if we are sick such as WebMD. Go.ogle is one of the most important sites, ranging for answers to any question such as 'What is the answer to life, the universe, and everything?' No matter how you go about your day, there is always technology in your path. Using technology to function, as a society, had modernized and changed our world for the (majority) better. When you look around your house or room how many AI or tech can you count? It may be more than you think. Your TVs, headphones, speakers, phones, and even washing machines! (depending on which one you own)
Explanation:
i think this is enough? maybe?
hope this helps:)
The two forms of satire are Horatian Satire and Juvenalian Satire. The first kind of satire employs mockery as its primary devices and accompanies adoration for the people being mocked. While, on the other hand, the second type of satire conveys an indignant tone and harshly ridicules its subject of satire.
Pope’s magnum opus The Rae of the Locke is the best example of Horatian satire. This wonderful creation by Pope conveys the style of mild mockery and indulgence in the society. In this epic poem, he parodies social shortcomings that accompany most of the individuals in the social world. His tools expose the absurd and foible attributes that prevail in within humanity.
Moving on, The Modest Proposal by Swift exemplifies the harsh, sneering satire of the second type. In this work of art, Swift acts directly on the menace he dislikes. He conveys his ideas by being outrageous and deplorable in his statements and suggestions in the book. For example, he mentions in his book that some individuals would be utilized as food in Ireland, which shows his direct and offensive approach in writing.
To conclude, the difference in both writers’ style is their approach to the readers, in which they present their thoughts, is obvious. While Pope utilizes mild tone and mocks gently, Swift acts like an indignant satirist with a direct revolutionary advancement of statements. Both portray all the needed attributes of Horatian and Juvenalian satire, respectively.
