Answer:
I’m not happy at all
I’ll pay it
Explanation:
I’m not happy at all
I’ll pay it
What makes both of them wrong is the fact that they were both abbreviated. In a formal letter, we are supposed to keep everything whatsoever we write formal, and as such, "I'm", in place of "I am" and "I'll" in place of "I will" is quite wrong for a formal letter, since the former is an informal way of writing the later.
Changing both context however, to "I am not happy at all", and "I will pay it" makes it fit into the requirements for a formal letter.
One good one might be that, a man would take great risks for revenge. The story is about revenge, so the easiest and best thing would be to wright about the revenge that Montresor try’s to get on his enemy. Be sure to explain why and how and what lead to his death. Hope it helps! ❤️
Answer: whether hunting another person can be justified.
Explanation:
This question is based on the short story, "The Most Dangerous Game", which is about an man named General Zaroff who has grown tired of hunting animals and now hunts human beings.
Rainsford gets trapped on the island by error and meets General Zaroff who suggests that he now hunts prey with courage and cunning and when Rainsford realizes he means humans and expresses error, General Zaroff attempts to justify it by saying that a young man such as Rainsford who has been to war should not hold human life in such high esteem.
