A false dilemma is a type of informal fallacy in which something is falsely claimed to be an "either/or" situation, when in fact there is at least one additional option.
The false dilemma fallacy can also arise simply by accidental omission of additional options rather than by deliberate deception. For example, "Stacey spoke out against capitalism, therefore she must be a communist" (she may be neither capitalist nor communist). "Roger opposed an atheist argument against Christianity, so he must be a Christian" (When it's assumed the opposition by itself means he's a Christian). Roger might be an atheist who disagrees with the logic of some particular argument against Christianity. Additionally, it can be the result of habitual tendency, whatever the cause, to view the world with limited sets of options.
Some philosophers and scholars believe that "unless a distinction can be made rigorous and precise it isn't really a distinction". An exception is analytic philosopher John Searle, who called it an incorrect assumption that produces false dichotomies.Searle insists that "it is a condition of the adequacy of a precise theory of an indeterminate phenomenon that it should precisely characterize that phenomenon as indeterminate; and a distinction is no less a distinction for allowing for a family of related, marginal, diverging cases."Similarly, when two options are presented, they often are, although not always, two extreme points on some spectrum of possibilities; this may lend credence to the larger argument by giving the impression that the options are mutually exclusive of each other, even though they need not be. Furthermore, the options in false dichotomies typically are presented as being collectively exhaustive, in which case the fallacy may be overcome, or at least weakened, by considering other possibilities, or perhaps by considering a whole spectrum of possibilities, as in fuzzy logic.
Both narrators possess pride in their faith.
Both narrators have a deep faith in God.
Both narrators are uncertain about wearing a religious head covering.
<em>Both narrators clearly show their desire to be part of their religion, pride in what they believe and faith in their God, the only issue they're concerned about it's the veil, a common accessory in their religion. </em>
<em>In the text, the narrator's speech is about convincing herself that using a veil would benefit herself and her relationship with God too. She wants to do it, but the fear, prejudices and other aspects make her uncertain about it.</em>
<em>In the picture, the girl admits her devotion to her religion since she was a child, however, now that she's grown, she finds herself reflective about a new issue: using a veil.</em>
Answer:
talk about what u did there what u seen and how u felt about each place u went to
Explanation:
hope i helped :)
D- rich flora has the most positive connotation
The correct answer is <span>d. a power structure in which each member knows his or her own place.
This does not necessarily mean that it is either a good or a bad thing. An example of positive hierarchy would be in a household where parents are above children and decide for them because the children are too small.</span>