1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gwar [14]
3 years ago
8

BRAINLIEST ASAPP!!!

History
2 answers:
gtnhenbr [62]3 years ago
5 0
No.

Monarchies tended to focus on ideals set forth on the monarch not the subjects. So even the nobles had some influence in the King or Queens decisions but it was never promised they had a say in the government. Monarchs did have advisors for financing and military but that does not mean they had to listen to them.

Example:

France had absolute monarch before the French revolution which he increased the debt of the French Kingdom which made him greatly unpopular. The French people had no choice but to rebel against King Louis XVI because his subjects had no say in government.
IRISSAK [1]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

NO

Explanation:

no because the monarchs would unjustly rule in their favor usually never thinking of who it would affect as long as they got what they wanted

HOPE THIS HELPED

You might be interested in
In the middle ages people exchanged their freedom and submitted to the social hierarchy
lana66690 [7]
A. Money.
Hope this helped
7 0
3 years ago
How did the Gutenberg press directly influence the reformation?
Alex777 [14]
It allowed books (ideas) to be printed en masse. Reformation vouchers were able to spread their ideals to many readers, causing many to be won over by their words. In essence, they outpaced their competitors.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two descriptions reflect characteristics of the Great Compromise?
lesantik [10]
I think the answer is A 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What style is the church of sainte-foy at conques, france?
WITCHER [35]
I believe the answer would be C. Romanesque

7 0
3 years ago
During the colonial period, what was one difference between slave labor in the north and slave labor in the south?.
nekit [7.7K]

Answer:

Explanation:

Most of those enslaved in the North did not live in large communities, as they did in the mid-Atlantic colonies and the South. Those Southern economies depended upon people enslaved at plantations to provide labor and keep the massive tobacco and rice farms running.

8 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • MANY POINTS 50PTS
    6·2 answers
  • Look at the map of Europe after World War II.
    6·2 answers
  • During pearl harbor hitler's army was planning major attack on what russian city
    15·1 answer
  • Which sentence contains error-free spelling?
    15·1 answer
  • Why gas prices skyrocketed during nixon’s presidency
    5·2 answers
  • Lennin is most closely associated with what?
    11·1 answer
  • In what present-day country was the ancient kingdom of kush located?
    9·2 answers
  • How did the world respond to kristallnacht?
    14·1 answer
  • +HELP DUE TONIGHT!!
    12·1 answer
  • I need an Extended PEEL Paragraph about "How did the Constitution guard against tyranny?" ASAP I will put the directions down be
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!