Robespierre struggled for the poor common man. He desired to eliminate financial disparity and boom the usual of living via education. Robespierre appears to have stood for the whole thing the Enlightenment turned into.
<h3>Who was Robespierre?</h3>
Robespierre was a French attorney and statesman who became one of the best-recognized and most influential figures of the French Revolution.
The end result of the French Revolution of 1789 turned into High Enlightenment's imaginative throwing of the antique government to remake society alongside rational lines, however, it devolved into the terror that confirmed the boundaries of its own thoughts and led, a decade later, to the upward thrust of Napoleon.
Thus, This is how Robespierre can be compared with other Enlightenment thinkers.
Learn more about Robespierre:
brainly.com/question/10171024
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer to this question is The federal government of the United States is the national government of the United States, a federal republic in North America, composed of 50 states, a federal district, five major self-governing territories and several island possessions
Answer:
Social issues include labor and working conditions , occupational health and safety , community health, safety, and security , etc.
Environmental issues include air pollution and climate change, land contamination, deforestation, etc.
Explanation:
Providing workers with a secure and stable working environment is necessary to ensure the development of the organization. An employee is expected to take all appropriate measures to protect staff from free of the chemical, biological and radiological hazards inherent in a specific business field.
The atmosphere and ocean waters are overloaded with carbon which has proved hazardous to the environment. Industrial waste has contaminated land and rivers with hazardous elements that have affected the whole food cycle. An altered environment has become one of the biggest threats to the survival of mankind.
Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently suspicious of one another and in competition with one another. This led him to propose that government should have supreme authority over people in order to maintain security and a stable society.
John Locke argued that people were born as blank slates, open to learning all things by experience. Ultimately this meant Locke viewed human beings in a mostly positive way, and so his approach to government was to keep the people empowered to establish and regulate their own governments for the sake of building good societies.
Further explanation:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
The correct answer is (D.) Romans
