Why did Washington refuse to help France or Britain?

PLS help asap Why would this map help Booth persuade politicians in London to help improve the lives of the poor?

djverab [1.8K]

Ship owner Charles Booth wanted to disprove socialist claims that one-fourth of Londoners were impoverished. Although he first assumed this was overstated, his 17-volume study eventually showed that the real number was far higher: one-third.

This is further explained below.

<h3>What are politicians?</h3>

Generally, A person who is involved in party politics or who either has or seeks to occupy an elected post in the government is referred to as a politician. Laws that govern the country and, by extension, its inhabitants are proposed, supported, and rejected by politicians, who themselves establish these laws. To use a general definition, a politician is somebody who aspires to hold influential political positions inside a government.

In conclusion, Shipowner Charles Booth set out to disprove the socialists' claims that one-fourth of London's residents were living in poverty. He believed that this was overstated, but the results of his investigation, which were published in 17 volumes, showed that the actual amount was considerably higher, at one-third.

Read more about residents

brainly.com/question/2375274

#SPJ1

3 0

1 year ago

One of the biggest differences in modern day Olympics and the Ancient Greek Olympics was that

Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

C. Women were not allowed by law to participate or watch the Olympics.

Women in ancient Greece were not allowed to participate or watch the Olympics.

Hope this helps! Good luck. :)

5 0

3 years ago

What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of these methods of direct democracy: Initiative, Referendum, and Recall?

Marina86 [1]

In the United States, where there is no direct democracy at the federal level, more than half of the states (and many municipalities) allow citizens to vote on initiatives, and the vast majority of states have mechanisms to promote initiatives or referendums. There are also community meetings (town meetings) and various institutions at the municipal level where citizens can interact with those responsible for administration in decision-making. The disadvantages of the initiatives is that any citizen could present it at any time and it should be analyzed and taken into account, which could take a long time.

Referendums are elections in which voters do not elect representatives but participate in taking direct participation on some important issue of the country. As advantages, it is highlighted that the Referendum can be used to solve problems of a political nature, or the improvement of the governmental image, when it is too deteriorated in front of the popular collective. Another aspect that touches a possible disadvantage, has to do with the circumstance that can be used as a strategy or political weapon to satisfy political interests or ambitions of power. It has also been argued that this figure has a meaning called "zero sum", that is, where the majority wins everything and the minority loses everything, originating a tyranny of majorities, that have answered one or several questions about a specific issue and that in the case at hand, has to do with the end of the armed conflict, questions that are closed and must be answered with the yes or no.
Revocation of mandate, revocation of mandate or recall referendum (in English, recall election), is a procedure by which citizens can cease their public office to an elected official, before the end of their respective period, by direct vote or by collection of signatures, depending on the geographic or population dimensions. Those who propose a revocation mechanism argue that these have a disciplinary effect on elected officials, in which elected representatives will make fewer unpopular decisions if this may cause them to be more likely to be subject to a recall campaign. However, the same argument is also used against the recall: opponents argue that the recall completely undermines representative government as it causes elected officials fear to make unpopular but necessary decisions. Another argument in favor of direct democracy is that it provides voters with a continuous opportunity to make a democratic decision about who governs them, since they not only have the opportunity to elect the people who represent them every two to six years, but also to maintain a degree of control over the decision of its duration in the position. However, its opponents maintain that the mechanism of revocation could be used irresponsibly, and that this could be used by the political parties as a political weapon against the rival of the holders. The assertion that the revocation mechanism is being used as a political instrument was made by many Democrats against activists of Republican parties in connection with the recall in California in 2003.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Unlike the stamp act, the townshend acts focused on:

Ksju [112]

While the Stamp Act was a direct tax the American had to pay, the Townshend Act was an indirect tax that was paid at the American port. The act was in response to Americans not complying with the Quartering Act.

7 0

3 years ago

Any two lines lie in exactly one plane. true or false

gladu [14]

I dont know but i think this website should help

https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/geometry/fundamental-ideas/postulates-and-theorems

8 0

3 years ago