In Walden, Thoureau presents a lesson of wisdom about the best way to life as an individual and as a social being.
What would look like excentricity to most people, means to him a reflection about the capitalism and the advantages and disadvantages of urbanization and industrialization.
The trancendentalism defended the vality of the intuition, and individualism. So it fits with the thoughts of Thoureau about the industrialization and reflections about life, as it is possible to confirm in Walden when a question is frequently asked about what is really important to the basic needs for the modern man to have a good life. He defends that it is possible to have a good life with the minimum of material resources to provide whatever the spirit needs, such as reading, reflections about life and nature watching. On the other hand, he afirms that it is possible to have a good life without an excess of clothes, food or fancy houses.
Answer:
Any, option A would sound the most proper in this situation.
When reading this, we saw how this lion fish was put into the Atlantic, and therefore, there's actually one thing that is actually something that we would want to consider, and that would actually indicate that it would be our answer.
Let's take notice in the paragraph on how the following sentence shows that this would be a total accident, and that this animal was putted in this location not by purpose, but by accident, and therefore, this was the actual lead on why<span> humans are at fault for the lion fish problem.
</span>
<span>The lionfish was accidentally introduced into the Atlantic Ocean in the 1990s.
This would be your answer, and this would be why it would be that they have adapted very quickly to their homes and all the they have now have.
Your answer: </span><span>The lionfish was accidentally introduced into the Atlantic Ocean in the 1990s.</span>
To fix the sentence, change "," after 2004 to ";" and remove the "and" before scientists. It makes the sentence sound better.
I hope that helps!
