In the first text, Zimbardo argues that people are neither "good" or "bad." Zimbardo's main claim is that the line between good and evil is movable, and that anyone can cross over under the right circumstances. He tells us that:
"That line between good and evil is permeable. Any of us can move across it....I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil--to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out."
Zimbardo argues that people can move across this line due to phenomena such as deindividualization, anonymity of place, dehumanization, role-playing and social modeling, moral disengagement and group conformity.
On the other hand, Nietzsche in "Morality as Anti-Nature" also argues that all men are capable of good and evil, and that evil is therefore a "natural" part of people. However, his opinion is different from Zimbardo in the sense that Nietzsche believes that judging people as "good" and "bad" is pointless because morality is anti-natural, and we have no good reason to believe that our behaviour should be modified to fit these precepts.
Usually they only know the words that are used often around them.
<span>Question 2 (Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)</span>
(MC)
Consider these sentences:
Our parents pay for our cell phones.
They like to be in constant contact with us.
Which sentence uses parenthetical elements most effectively to combine the information in the sentences?
Parents (who pay for our cell phones) like to be in constant contact with us. Parents who pay for our phones (like to be) in constant contact (with us). Our parents like to be in constant contact with us (even though) they pay—for our cell phones.<span> Liking to be in constant contact with us, our parents—pay—for our cell phones. </span>
Hey there!
Sentence: Even though he had good intentions, Malik didn’t make it to the party.
Type of sentence: Complex.
Explanation: A complex sentence is formed by an independent clause, and one or more dependent clauses connected to it. The use of subordinating conjunctions and punctuation is a way to identify those sentences.
In this case, we have have a sentence divided into 2 parts by a comma. The first sentence is the dependent clause, which does not make sense by itself, and starts with a Subordinating conjunction: Even though. Finally, we have a comma, which is followed by the dependent clause and those two parts form a complex structure sentence.
Hope this helps!
Mark as brainliest, please.
Answer:
It seems like some natural disaster like earthquake. Which destroyed that person's home. ;-;
