Its hard to say does the author seem mad happy or sad look over it again
An example of a moral dilemma using direct characterization would be :
<span>Jake, brave, pitiful, and older than his years, gazed down at his starving family. His mother had passed on a few months ago, and her dying wish was that the family stay together. Jake knew the foster system; it was unlikely that they could all stay together, especially with his track record with the law. Yet, he knew that they would not survive long without more food and money. He felt torn between fulfilling his promise to his mother and that other promise he made, the promise to himself. He had vowed to change his life when his mother was diagnosed with cancer. Stealing would fulfill her promise (as long as he didn't get caught) but break the promise to himself that made him a new man. This new man cared for his siblings; what would happen to his family if he became a thief?
</span>
This is the correct answer on edgenuity
This is a question of morals and ethics, and the answer will depend on your own personal, subjective opinions.
On one hand, some people would say that we should experiment as much as we can - going to such lengths where the modification through genetic engineering will allow us to create new humans based on our wants and needs. We will be able to choose our baby's eye color, hair color, everything we might want to do will be possible, and for some people, that is a welcome future.
However, on the other hand, there is also a large number of people who are against such modifications, primarily because it is immoral and 'against God.' In their opinion, we are playing God, doing what we were not supposed to do, and therefore will have to pay the price.
It all depends on how you look at the subject - it is quite personal.
