Answer:
temporary suspension and maybe an Improvement Plan.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario, if the company has adopted a progressive discipline program then the according response would be a temporary suspension and maybe an Improvement Plan. This is because a progressive discipline program follows the following steps accordingly.
1) Verbal Counseling. The first step in a progressive discipline process is to merely have a conversation with the employee. ...
2) Written Warning. The second step should be another conversation that is documented in a written format. ...
3) Employee Suspension and Improvement Plan. ...
4) Termination.
Seeing since step 2 has already been done the next course of action would be step 3.
$3500 sum will spk record for interest expense in their december 31, 2022
Interest = $ 6000 for 12 months.
From June to December there will be 7 months due,
therefore 7/12x6000 = $ 3500
An interest expense is the fetched brought about by an substance for borrowed reserves. Intrigued cost may be a non-operating cost appeared on the salary explanation. It speaks to intrigued payable on any borrowings—bonds, credits, convertible obligation or lines of credit. It is basically calculated as the intrigued rate times the exceptional foremost sum of the obligation. Interest expense on the income statement represents interest accrued during the period covered by the financial statements, and not the amount of interest paid over that period. While interest expense is tax-deductible for companies, in an individual's case, it depends on their jurisdiction and also on the loan's purpose.
Learn more about Interest expense here
brainly.com/question/14185533
#SPJ4
Answer: C. inefficiently low; inefficiently high
Explanation:
If the cotton farmers are not made to pay for the damage that their pesticides cost then they will maintain production at a relatively high level because their input costs will be relatively low. As a result of this high level of production, the price of the goods will be relatively low as well. The point at which both market equilibrium quantity and price are at in this scenario are considered inefficient because they are not taking into account, the true cost of production being the effects of the pesticides being used.
However, if they are made to pay for this negative externality that they are the cause of, it will increase their production cost and force them to reduce production to keep these costs low. As they reduce production, the market price will increase as supply is less.
Answer:
2) assumption not made
Explanation:
The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.
maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.
