Answer:
It is likely that Rawls claimed that there is no certainty in the statement that you deserve the wealth that you have and that it was acquired through the exploitation of your own talents. This, therefore, is a doubtful statement and must be carefully evaluated.
Explanation:
John Rawls was not in favor of the idea that individuals who use their talents to generate their income are worthy of all their income. That's because For Rawls, the money these individuals get is not, in fact, generated by the talent they have, but by the demand that society imposes on these talents. Therefore, these individuals owe a debt to the society for which they work. This debt must be paid by taxing their income. This taxation will generate the resources that will pay the society that benefits these individuals.
I believe that the answer to the question provided above is that that tertiary and quaternary periods have greater resolution in their subdivisions (epochs) than the periods composing the paleozoic era because of the sudden changes of the <span>tertiary and quaternary periods it is subdivided.</span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
Answer:
Sumerians developed art that was largely reflective of their religious beliefs. Some artistic archeological finds depict flora and fauna of the region. The Sumerian art medium of choice was clay which was abundant in the region, but statues made from stone have also been unearthed.
Answer: Few of his claims are supported by any real evidence.
Explanation: Give me the brainiest
