Police violence should be the best answer. There are all types of marchers, marching for different things. There would only be a lack of support from other citizens if those marches weren’t agreed with by the majority, basically saying that some marches had support from others. A repeal of voting legislation is definitely not the answer, as a march is not enough to strip someone’s voting rights away, no matter what time period we’re speaking of. A lack of nation television coverage could be a near answer, as some marches may be seen unimportant and therefore not being televised. But as the question directs to marchers experiences, and not a certain march, this wouldn’t be right. By using order of elimination, the only available, and reasonable answer would be police violence, as many marches are seen as public disorder, and therefore treated by the law. Most of the time, these marches are made to disrupt, and polices mostly respond with brutality or brute.
The angular measurement is half the angle in the center, so we deduce the angle BAC equals half the angle in the center. Which mean BAC = 1/2 BOC => BAC = 52/2 = 26°.
<span> millions of Americans migrated west and into urban areas, and hundreds of thousands of African Americans moved to northern cities. ... Pragmatists notably </span>did<span> not just hope to garner government support for reform, but also sought to directly transform government through their influence (Filip, 2015).</span>
Answer:
The Constitution does not mention political parties, yet they play an important role in U.S. government. They began to emerge with disputes over the ratification of the Constitution, becoming known as the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.
Explanation: copy and paste that
Hmmmmmmmmmmajsjakakozijsjqnqkao<33
