1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dybincka [34]
3 years ago
12

What are three things from the film Dunkirk that are NOT historically accurate. How do you know this?

History
1 answer:
yulyashka [42]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

1 The British ships in the movie appear to be expected at the mole during daylight hours, although orders given at the beginning of June 1940 had made it clear that they would only come in at night.

2 Equally remiss is the failure to profile the bitter rows between French and British commanders over whether the British should carry on holding the port until more French troops could be evacuated. Nor is there even the smallest reference to the number of troops left behind at Dunkirk when the evacuation was terminated: on the British side, a hospital full of British wounded staffed by a skeleton staff of doctors and medical orderlies, and on the French side no less than 80,000 soldiers.

3 women appear at Dunkirk on some of the little ships, although I never encountered any in the course of my research.

You might be interested in
What does liberty in the preamble mean
Elena L [17]
Liberty means the freedom of the united states itself
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who is in control of history? a : man b : god c : the historian
podryga [215]
B: god is in control of history
4 0
3 years ago
In what ways do the Crusades lend themselves to the current mistrust between Christians and Muslims? Explain your answer using c
dezoksy [38]

Answer:

Muslim forces ultimately expelled the European Christians who invaded the eastern Mediterranean repeatedly in the 12th and 13th centuries—and thwarted their effort to regain control of sacred Holy Land sites such as Jerusalem. Still, most histories of the Crusades offer a largely one-sided view, drawn originally from European medieval chronicles, then filtered through 18th and 19th-century Western scholars.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Which statement best describes the goals of mikhail gorbachev policies of perestroika and glasnost
satela [25.4K]
The answer is C hoped this helped :)
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write a paragraph of at least 125 words that considers why D.W. Griffith's movie, Birth of a Nation, was so controversial.​
Burka [1]

Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.

“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.

 

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where were romans coin used
    15·2 answers
  • Europeans believed, generally, in the geocentric theory of the universe, even though this model had been contradicted by empiric
    7·1 answer
  • What nomadic invaders contributed to the collapse of the Han Chinese
    10·1 answer
  • At the doha round of the wto in late 2001, an agenda was established to
    8·1 answer
  • The first textile factory in the United States was started by
    9·2 answers
  • How were military actions in Japan and Spain similar to those of Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler?
    15·1 answer
  • Hich would likely be the least biased account of the December 7, 1941, attack on Pearl Harbor?
    13·1 answer
  • 1.What were the causes of World War I?
    6·1 answer
  • Short essay mexican american war
    14·1 answer
  • The decimal system was invented by what empire.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!