The narrator in Frankenstein is Victor Frankenstein. As this paragraph is taken out of context one can only assume that he is the one talking (as the narrator). First person- Person speaking Second person- Person being spoken to Third person- Being spoken about
So looking at this text we can conclude that it a someone speaking so that gives us first person.
Therefore that would make this first person (victor).
Hope I helped! Let me know if you need more help or would like further explanation! :)
Hello, This question is incomplete. The full question is:
When we arrived, however, the library was closed. About a dozen people were milling about the glass front doors, wearing puzzled expressions and muttering with frustration
Which best analyzes the quality of the evidence's support for the claim that the funding for the public library should be protected because the library offers important programs and services that benefit the whole community?
A. The quality is good; the evidence supports the claim by using a personal example to show that there is clear community demand for the library's services
B. The quality is okay; the evidence supports the claim by showing a need, but it would be better if the writer had asked each person why they were frustrated.
C. The quality is poor; the evidence does not give an exact statistic to explain how many of the people were at the library to attend a program.
D. The quality is okay; the evidence supports the idea that the library offers programs, but it would be better if the writer had asked these people what specific programs they attended.
Answer:
D. The quality is okay; the evidence supports the idea that the library offers programs, but it would be better if the writer had asked these people what specific programs they attended.
Explanation:
In order to present a good support of evidence, the author must present data about the programs offered by the library, their quality, availability and the relevance they present. In order to know about these data, it would be important that the author had heard the public's opinion about the library's programs, since, as users, the public can offer a view with less bias.
Answer:
Anne's words show resilience because they illustrate her belief that things will get better, and how she will hold her ambitions and morals close even during trying times. She will not give up who she is due to the situation she is in. This claim is supported by "I must uphold my ideals, for perhaps the time will come when I shall be able to carry," This shows her hope towards a better future. Additionally, this text also shows how she hopes that after these events, she can return her life to a sense of normalcy.
<em>Hope this helped! Comment if you have any questions. :)</em>
Answer:
Write a paragraph for each step of the process, with each step clearly labeled.
Explanation:
The way caterpillars change into butterflies is difficult to explain because it is a process. When we are dealing with processes, the best way to explain them is to divide them into steps that are easy to understand. In this example, explaining each step in a single paragraph will create a text that is easy to follow. Moreover, this clarity can be increased even more by labeling each step.
