<span>Gatto: An aura of paranoia seems to pervade Gatto’s angry, impressioned plea for changes to America’s educational system; as part of his argument, he tries to convince us that we are pawns in a gigantic plot. Gatto identifies with the students whose lives, he believes, have been ruined by some monstrous entity-“corporate society”? ----that tries to grind children down until they become docile, robotic creatures. His presentation-particularly toward the end-is facile and ideological; it can be hard to accept his unexplained, unsupported assertions. For example, is the purpose of tracking students necessarily the elimination of the inferior ones, or can one interpret it as one way of maintaining a meritocracy? A good summary should refer to Gatto’s scattershot method of argument. One might also question the accuracy of his paraphrases. Inglis’s list of educational purposes, for example, might be presented quite differently by a more conservative commentator. It is a loaded topic.</span>
The sentence that demonstrate correct punctuation of a compound sentence is Susan learned Russian with ease but, I could never get past the basics of Russian grammar. That is option A.
<h3>What is Compound sentence?</h3>
A Compound sentence is defined as the sentence that is made up of two clauses which are independent clauses that are joined together by a conjunction such as for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so.
From the sentence given, the correct sentence with the right punctuation is "Susan learned Russian with ease but, I could never get past the basics of Russian grammar".
This is because the first independent clauses must end with a comma before the conjunction.
Learn more about clause here:
brainly.com/question/541212
#SPJ1
Answer:
financial management
Explanation:
she helps clients understand their capabilities in finance.
Answer:
Animals should definitely not be used for testing. i do not agree with the opinion that they should be. the animal rights act is very important. why should we test our products on helpless little animals? we can pay people to test it out on, or on fabrics or anything else. most animals cant even protect themselves and many animals die in vain because of animal testing everyday. the save ralph short video really opened my eyes to the fact that animal testing has gone too far.
we shouldnt get the choice to take lives away, to take mothers away from their babies. in an article it states, testing on animals has led to permanent damage to their psychological or physical well-being. this is not okay at all.
though we might need beauty and health products and need to know if its safe for us for not, this isnt the right thing to be doing. we shouldnt be doing this to animals. we shouldnt have this choice. ill add more when i get home. goodluck.
