The correct answer is <span>Squanto. He was a Native American who helped the new colonies establish themselves and grow food which meant that they were saved since they wouldn't survive without it. He knew the language so he also served as a translator and a mediator.</span>
They cut off their trade supplies!
Be sure to rate me up and give me a thanks :D
D.provide public schools for poor children.
Victorian Era social reform concerned the problems created by industrialization and urbanization. The goals were typically to create more government regulation of business and more services for workers.
A social reformer in the Victorian Era would have supported public schools because it would have created a more equal society and a better base of workers. It would have also solved the issue of what to do with children after they were banned from working in factories. Public schools served to teach all members of society basic skills like reading, writing, and arithmetic. It would have also taught work skills necessary for factory work such as being on time and working on bells.
Answer:
in France there was a very strong support of extreme right (this terms is quite broad and does not include so-called nazism) already before the Great War. After 1870 French extreme right became quite powerful and had a stimulating support of intellectuals (Barres, Maurras) who were able to stimulate new generations ...a big part of intellectual elite invited Mussolini´s coup and in 30s there was a hayday of French right. When Hitler came in poweŕ, he had a strong support among French. But French extreme-right was frequently more conservative than modern (nazism).
Explanation:
Jacques Doriot (leader and founder of PPF), writer Pierre Drieu la Rochelle, Robert Brasillach or Céline had many motives to support nazism. They believed in something that could be called "revolution of the body and instinct", the criticized democracy of the IIIrd republic because of its liberalism and intellectualism. They wanted strong leader and politics of body and instinct. But they were never united. In the government there was a division between "marchalistes" (followers of Pétain) and "lavalistes" (folloowers of pro-nazi laval).
