Answer:
have you written/finished your homework?
Explanation:
ljk
llplplplplp
l
Answer and Explanation:
Since your question does not present any options to choose from, I'll answer based on my knowledge of the story.
<u>In the short story "To Build a Fire", by Jack London, the immediate danger that concerns the man is freezing to death.</u> The character of the story has ignored a warning an old man gave him about roaming in the forest by himself when the cold weather is harsh. He chose to trust his abilities against nature, only to be humbled by it. The man did not have the knowledge, wisdom, and capacity to survive in the wild. The freezing temperatures were going to kill him if he didn't build a fire to keep himself warm. Even the dog that accompanies the man knew that, and couldn't seem to understand why the man wouldn't do it. However, when the man finally realized the urgent need for fire, he was not able to start one, and ended up dying. That is indeed a common theme in Jack London's work - the survival of the fittest. Had the man been smarter or stronger, he would have survived.
Answer:
One rhetorical part would be, I want you to use what is left to light that fire in you.
Explanation:
Answer:
It really depends. If the student that is peer reviewing is diligent in doing the task he/she is given, it may improve peoples writing style. Reviews of drafts may also help students in being able to critique others as well as give feedback, while building a relationship with the writer.
However, if the peer reviewer does not do a good job, then it would not help improve their writings.
A good review generally consists of at least one or more positive feedback, critique on any problems, some opinions on how to fix some issues, of course the basics such as spelling & grammar check, but the whole of the peer review is to give some other view, and trying to mold the essay into something better.
~
