1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
svetoff [14.1K]
3 years ago
5

Which television show or movie shows procedures/or a process to collect evidence from a violent crime scene that differs from th

e actual procedures/process that happen in real life. Then discuss how these two procedures or processes regarding evidence collection portrays the criminal investigation process and how these processes or procedures differ from the actual reality of a crime scene investigation.
* I’m not really. Interested in crime shows so I don’t have a clue
Law
2 answers:
ryzh [129]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Criminal law

Explanation:

Lyrx [107]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Mindhunter

America's Most Wanted

Criminal: UK

You might be interested in
Clucking blucksClucking blucksClucking blucksClucking blucksClucking blucksClucking blucksClucking blucks
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

yoo clucker brainly.com/question/16073730

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Auto insurance is: A) required by law B) required in a few states C) optional if your car and house are paid off D) an optional
blagie [28]

Auto insurance is required by law

What is auto insurance?

At its simplest form, auto insurance is the insurance coverage that caters for third parties or victims of auto accidents that are not the drivers, in that , it takes care of their medical expenses and further damages caused to them.

Auto insurance is mandatory in 49 out of the 50 states in the US, in other words, it is not in anyway optional, which means that option C and D are obviously incorrect.

The second option is also wrong since 49 out of 50 cannot be regarded as few states, in short, it is most appropriate to conclude that it is required by the law, which means option A is the most appropriate in this case.

Find out more about auto insurance on:brainly.com/question/1490222

#SPJ1

5 0
1 year ago
What is Cold-calling in marketing and finance?
OleMash [197]

La llamada en frío es una técnica de venta para captar potenciales clientes sin que estos esperen una interacción en ese momento determinado.  

En una llamada en frío el fin es conocer a los clientes potenciales, realizar una prospección de éstos para incluir datos en una segunda fase posterior en la que se realizan las llamadas de venta telefónica.

Diferencias entre venta telefónica y llamada en frío

Aunque de manera inicial se pueden confundir, cada una tiene una serie de características y objetivos distintos.

Llamada en frío: Es el paso inicial a la venta telefónica, su objetivo es acometer una acción más publicitaria y persuasiva. Por ejemplo, cuando de repente llaman para dar información sobre un seguro de coche. Es una llamada que no se espera y se realiza una investigación durante la llamada de las posibilidades de ese cliente potencial.

Venta telefónica: En esta acción el vendedor lo que pretende directamente es persuadir al usuario a que compre su producto o servicio. Previamente han sido preparados a través de diferentes técnicas para ejercer un trabajo de presión y muy persuasivo.

8 0
3 years ago
Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete sentences. Scroll down to view additional
Nikitich [7]
Americans fought the war on land with essentially two types of organization: the Continental (national) Army and the state militias. The total number of the former provided by quotas from the states throughout the conflict was 231,771 men, and the militias totaled 164,087.
5 0
3 years ago
What was the supreme court's main decision in Palko v. Connecticut?
VashaNatasha [74]

In Palko v. Connecticut (1937), the Supreme Court had to decide whether "due process of law" means states must obey the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment

<u>Explanation: </u>

The observation of the Supreme Court is that the convict cannot be punished two times for the same offense. It is simple and very clear that the convict cannot be punished under the fourth and fifth amendments for same offense.

In this particular case, the prosecution has charged Frank Palko for first-degree murder and the court has given a decree as life imprisonment. But the actual nature crime amounts to second-degree murder.

So, the state of Connecticut appealed against this judgment and it has been proved that offense made by Frank Palko amounts to second-degree murder and the death penalty is awarded to convict. The Supreme Court's main decision in Palko vs Connecticut was Palko was the victim of unconstitutional double jeopardy.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Please help <br> What do you think the poster is saying?
    9·2 answers
  • Do you think it would be useful to determine the chemical properties of any of the evidence? Why or why not?
    7·1 answer
  • The plain view doctrine refers to the power of law enforcement to seize any contraband materials that are in plain view, even if
    11·1 answer
  • Who is all in the school build and who is virtual
    11·1 answer
  • Question 5 (1 point)
    9·2 answers
  • Democracy is a ___ sport
    11·2 answers
  • What historical figure inspired the idiom of favoring the magistrate
    5·1 answer
  • Embezzlement. A jail guard is working on the night shift all alone. He locks himself out of his office, leaving all the jail key
    15·1 answer
  • Facts about feminism in the 1960s and 70s in America
    13·1 answer
  • What are sources name the classification of sources Short answer?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!