Auto insurance is required by law
What is auto insurance?
At its simplest form, auto insurance is the insurance coverage that caters for third parties or victims of auto accidents that are not the drivers, in that , it takes care of their medical expenses and further damages caused to them.
Auto insurance is mandatory in 49 out of the 50 states in the US, in other words, it is not in anyway optional, which means that option C and D are obviously incorrect.
The second option is also wrong since 49 out of 50 cannot be regarded as few states, in short, it is most appropriate to conclude that it is required by the law, which means option A is the most appropriate in this case.
Find out more about auto insurance on:brainly.com/question/1490222
#SPJ1
La llamada en frío es una técnica de venta para captar potenciales clientes sin que estos esperen una interacción en ese momento determinado.
En una llamada en frío el fin es conocer a los clientes potenciales, realizar una prospección de éstos para incluir datos en una segunda fase posterior en la que se realizan las llamadas de venta telefónica.
Diferencias entre venta telefónica y llamada en frío
Aunque de manera inicial se pueden confundir, cada una tiene una serie de características y objetivos distintos.
Llamada en frío: Es el paso inicial a la venta telefónica, su objetivo es acometer una acción más publicitaria y persuasiva. Por ejemplo, cuando de repente llaman para dar información sobre un seguro de coche. Es una llamada que no se espera y se realiza una investigación durante la llamada de las posibilidades de ese cliente potencial.
Venta telefónica: En esta acción el vendedor lo que pretende directamente es persuadir al usuario a que compre su producto o servicio. Previamente han sido preparados a través de diferentes técnicas para ejercer un trabajo de presión y muy persuasivo.
Americans fought the war on land with essentially two types of organization: the Continental (national) Army and the state militias. The total number of the former provided by quotas from the states throughout the conflict was 231,771 men, and the militias totaled 164,087.
In Palko v. Connecticut (1937), the Supreme Court had to decide whether "due process of law" means states must obey the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The observation of the Supreme Court is that the convict cannot be punished two times for the same offense. It is simple and very clear that the convict cannot be punished under the fourth and fifth amendments for same offense.
In this particular case, the prosecution has charged Frank Palko for first-degree murder and the court has given a decree as life imprisonment. But the actual nature crime amounts to second-degree murder.
So, the state of Connecticut appealed against this judgment and it has been proved that offense made by Frank Palko amounts to second-degree murder and the death penalty is awarded to convict. The Supreme Court's main decision in Palko vs Connecticut was Palko was the victim of unconstitutional double jeopardy.