Answer:
I feel like you should tell you aunt, so if something happens, you could have some adult to get help from. It kinda depends what kind of party it is. If its with people older than you and if guys are gonna be there and its one of those drink and smoke and crazy parties, for your own self-respect, safety, and worth, its better not to go. (your not gonna miss anything anyways) Its better to just have a party between people you can trust and such. The parental supervision isnt needed for EVERY party. MOST parties dont have parents literally watching u like a hawk. But it just depends whos going to be there, what they are planning to do and if you think its going to be safe.
Explanation:
Ive made a mistake of going to a unsupervised party a while ago, and i regret it. Just make sure you stay distant from suspicious activity and just be paranoid and cautious of whats around u. OVERALL I THINK U SHOULD GO AND HAVE SOME FUNNNNN HAHA YOLO. (but stick with ur friends) :)
Answer:
rob the protagonist takes action when he shows' Sistine the tiger because that helped him to let it out
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. He is hesitant, which distracts his audience from his purpose of inspiring them. Faulkner's speech consisted of instilling upon the young writers to write about. Faulkner's acceptance speech delivery was not effective, but of course being the winner of a Nobel Peace Prize for literature, his written words were unforgettable. Faulkner's speech illustrated his character, his feelings toward his work, and the impact he hopes to have on writers. He did so by using rhetoric devices ethos and pathos effectively.
Answer:
I think he´s (partly) right
Explanation:
Partly right because yes, colleges are flooded with individuals who seem to be out of place and not learning anything that they could have learned outside the school building. Murray´s essay follows quite clearly the opinion of Noam Chomsky. The strategical creation of a separated American class system is a daring theory that needs some (personal) coments because of its elitist element, i.e. we who study have (keep) the power.
Two examples:
México is a democracy in name where the powerful and rich people send their kids - no matter how stupid they are - to college schools and private universities that only exist as the entry door to a well-paid job. And even if you don´t go to university you can always buy your degree, as former president Fox did.
Germany is a real democracy that has a social education system. It is costly but the economic support (bafug in German) for students is based on how much your parents earn. If your parents are poor you get more money per month to study and vice versa.
Now kindly look at the American educational system and see if it resembles more the Mexican or the German system.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, this would most likely occur in the middle of the plot to add suspense. </span>
