The two pivotal factors that distinguish one competitive strategy from another boil down to Multiple Choice is explained in the following way
Explanation:
- The generic types of competitive strategies include: low-cost provider, broad differentiation, best-cost provider, focused low-cost, and focused differentiation strategies. Which of the following generic types of competitive strategies is typically the "best" strategy for a company to employ?
- What sets focused (or market niche) strategies apart from low-cost leadership and broad differentiation strategies is: their concentrated attention on serving the needs of buyers in a narrow piece of the overall market. ... meaningfully lower overall costs than rivals on comparable products.
- 1- By using its lower-cost edge to underprice competitors and attract price-sensitive buyers in great numbers to increase total profits.
- When a Low-Cost Provider Strategy Works Best
- Most buyers use the product in the same ways. Buyers incur low costs in switching among sellers. Large buyers have the power to bargain down prices. New entrants can use introductory low prices to attract buyers and build a customer base.
Answer (A):
Need more data to select the better adviser
<u>Explanation: </u>
Adviser A averaged 19% return on the investment which is more than that of Adviser B who averaged 16% return on investment. However, adviser A has a beta of 1.5 which is also greater than that of Adviser B who has a beta of 1. This means that adviser A made a more riskier investment and hence a higher average return on investment. We need more data to tell which adviser performed better in relation to each other.
Answer (B):
Investment Adviser B
<u>Explanation:</u>
= T-bill rate = 6%
= Market return = 14%
= Market risk premium = 14% - 6% = 8%
= Average Return by Adviser A =19%
= Beta of Adviser A = 1.5
= Average Return by Adviser B =16%
= Beta of Adviser B = 1
CAPM Equation is 
<u>For Adviser A</u>
= 6 + 1.5 (14 - 6) = 18%
The expected average return for the investment is 18% which means that Adviser A over performed the market by 1 %
<u>For Adviser B</u>
= 6 + 1 (14 - 6) = 14%
The expected average return for the investment is 14% which means that the Adviser B over performed the market by 2 %
Clearly, Adviser B performed better than Adviser A.
Answer (C):
Adviser B
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u />
In this part, the
and 
All else remains the same
We make similar calculation as in part B

Ur answer is... 4) You will be paid for your time and give you the benefit of saving money for your career education and training
ig this is the best benefit...
...lower the amount of products they create.