Answer:
c. Work in Process--Department 2 375,000 Work in Process--Department 1 375,000
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Work in Process - Department 2 $375,000 ($100,000 + $125,000 + $150,000)
To Work in Proces - Department 1 $375,000
(Being the flow of cost from Dept 1 to Dept 2 is recorded)
Here the work in process for dept 2 is debited as it increased the assets and credited the work in process for dept 2 as it decreased the assets
A mortgage professional can use any of the following techniques to detect fraudulent documents, except requiring that consumers provide only notarized supporting documentation.
A mortgage expert can spot forged paperwork using a variety of techniques. These include comparing the handwriting on an original application and any supporting papers, following the chain of custody for all verifications, and checking for watermarks and printed fraud protection patterns on pay stubs and bank statements.
A mortgage broker collaborates with all parties involved in the loan process, including the real estate agent, underwriter, and closing agent, to ensure that a borrower receives the best financing and that the loan closes on schedule.
A broker has the option of working alone or with a brokerage firm. For in-depth news, comment, and analysis, as well as market trends and business information, the industry frequently turns to MPA as a valuable resource.
To learn more about mortgages refer to:
brainly.com/question/13447700
#SPJ4
Answer: True
Explanation:
The balanced scorecard perspective implies that the company has to satisfy their customer through the provision of quality products and services.
From the question, the target of increasing customers satisfaction is a good example of a performance target that is focused on customer's perspective of the balance scorecard. This means that the statement is true.
Answer:
A. In a comparative negligence state, the actions of Don and Alice will be weighed to determine liability.
Explanation:
Comparative negligence is a way to weigh the negligence of the parties involved in a dispute.
In this case Don could be said to be negligent by not securing the boards properly in his truck, resulting in them falling off.
On the other hand Alice should have not been driving very closely to Don's truck.
So the actions of Don and Alice will be weighed to determine liability.
