Answer:
The term usage rate refers to the maximum number of times a customer has used a product in a given period.
Explanation:
The usage rate classifies consumer on the basis of how much of the product they are consuming in the given period.
On the basis of this rate consumers can be classified as non users, light users, moderate users and heavy users.
This usage rate is often used for market segmentation. The firms prefer to target one heavy user instead of several light users.
Answer: the substitution bias
Explanation: The substitution bias shows the tendency of consumers of buying less costly good in place expensive one.
In the given case when the price of apple rises and the price of oranges falls then the consumer will purchase more of the oranges. In such a scenario the index will rise showing that the good which was purchased earlier by the consumers has risen however in the real world the consumer shave sifted their demand to a less expensive product.
Thus, it will lead to overstatement of substitution bias.
The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is the average rate an organization pays to finance its assets.
<h3>How is Weighted Average Cost of Capital determined?</h3>
It is calculated by averaging the rates of all of the company's capital sources (debt and equity), with weights assigned based on the proportions of each component.
Business owners may consult their WACC to discover the ideal ratio of equity to debt for their organization. A company's cost of equity is frequently higher than the interest rate on its debt. Entrepreneurs usually want a higher rate of return on their investment than what lenders charge for borrowing money. In addition, interest on debt is tax deductible. Therefore, as a company's debt as a percentage of total capital increases, its WACC frequently declines. Getting lower borrowing rates reduces WACC.
To know more about Weighted Average Cost of Capital, visit:
brainly.com/question/28561354
#SPJ1
Answer:
1. a GENERAL partner
2. a LIMITED partner
Explanation:
A GENERAL partner has responsibility or liability for losses beyond their investment. They are bound up to the extent of their personal assets incase the partnership is insolvent. They are also responsible in the management and decision-making process in the operation of the partnership. A LIMITED partner on the other hand is only liable in the partnership’s losses up to the extent of his investment in case of partnership’s insolvency. But a limited partner should NOT participate in the management and decision-making process of the operation in the partnership for him to be not liable up to the extent of his personal asset. A limited partner should also be recorded in the articles of the partnership as “LIMITED PARTNER”, otherwise he is liable as general partner.
The correct answer to this situation is the following.
Well, here we are facing an ethical dilemma. Alex thought that she "played her cards" optimally and benefited from the situation. The companies acted in "goodwill" and pay as promised all the expenses when they both sent the checks a weel later. But that is not the kind of conduct that is expected from an ethical professional. She is cheating in order to get money from the companies.
What she should have done is be honest and candidly express the real situation. That should have shown that she is a person of high values that respects the hard-earned money of the company and that she always acts with class, being honest and open.