Answer:
El año pasado conocí a un peruano en un bar en San Francisco. Estos encuentros casuales requieren, como mínimo, una conversación: ¿de dónde eres? ¿A qué equipo de fútbol apoyas? El hombre tenía aproximadamente mi edad, y también había nacido en Lima y criado en los Estados Unidos. La conversación se convirtió rápidamente en la llamada y respuesta habituales, una lista de calles y barrios, mercados deslucidos y bares mugrientos cuya existencia calentaba nuestros corazones.
Explanation:
Answer:
Those opposed to the development of political parties believed that political parties were a threat to the government and that they could divide our country by discriminating against minorities.
On the other side, there were many who were completely in favor of the development of political parties, based on the notion that people will naturally dispute on matters. Furthermore, they were well aware that people who shared similar viewpoints should band together.
Explanation:
For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully, chiefly because of narrow judicial interpretations of what constitutes trade or commerce among states. When it was first passed, the Sherman Antitrust Act was largely ineffective at stopping industrial monopolies. Courts at the time tended to hold a very narrow view of what constituted “trade or commerce among states,” and most companies were not held liable under the act. For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Antitrust Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully. Ironically, its only effective use for a number of years was against labor unions, which were held by the courts to be illegal combinations.
Answer:
2 fl.oz for $3.99; 1 quart for $59.99; or a wholesale bottle of 0.4 gallon.
