Question

Benny was arrested by New York Police and charged with the armed robbery of a taxicab driver. While Benny was in jail waiting for his trial, a New York undercover officer was placed in Benny’s cell. Before the officer asked any questions, Benny said that he had robbed the cab driver. Benny’s statement was used against him at trial, despite his objection that he was not read his Miranda Rights, in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
Question: Should the court allow Benny’s statement to be used in court?

Answer 1

Yes they should because it’s still evidence towards him commuting the crime and it’s valuable and creditable evidence