Question

Texas is one of only a few states that elect judges in partisan elections. It has been suggested that perhaps this is not an appropriate way to choose judges, given the nature of their job. In a one to three page essay, discuss the problems that could occur when citizens elect judges in partisan elections, including campaign contributions, lack of minority representation on the bench, perceptions of fairness, and lack of knowledge on the part of the voters.

Answer 1

Answer:

Texas citizens elects judges in partisan voting electoral campaigns with emphasis on the selection of judges on independent nomination basis, re-selection basis or procurement of one more tenure for judges in elections in state legislatures with deciding and implementing of policies from court lawyers in various cases of people.The election campaign consists of democratic leaders and republic leaders with contesting between them.Further the judge election contestant system wants an upgradation of their contestant methodology with priority of choosing judges appointed by governers of the region in texas for one term and then re-electing these judges after revealing their experiances and work performance to citizens of the society for further terms ahead.The report reading pattern and report analysis was observed for state legislatures,court lawyers and political party members along with their study to solve cases.The term political campaign rules further includes the adverstisement from political party members and investment from them in organizing political party meetings agenda.Further media coverage is provided to various political party members and presidential post members before the start of elections where they give speech to citizens of the society.The rule further considers the total elimination of disparity,racial bias and fairness during political campaign and voting in elections with observance of strict discipline during organizing political meetings in public places.